2014
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.875118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From study to work: methodological challenges of a graduate destination survey in the Western Cape, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaires were self‐administered, which enabled Gen Y respondents to participate without assistance. The questionnaires were disseminated on a face‐to‐face basis in the SA, using a snowball sampling technique (referrals), due to low response rates of online research in SA and other emerging economies (du Toit, Kraak, Favish, & Fletcher, ), whereas an online data collection approach was utilized in RO (Bartozik‐Purgat & Filimon, ). In this manner, a diverse range of Gen Y, which included employed, self‐employed, unemployed, and students (aged 18‐32 years old), participated in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaires were self‐administered, which enabled Gen Y respondents to participate without assistance. The questionnaires were disseminated on a face‐to‐face basis in the SA, using a snowball sampling technique (referrals), due to low response rates of online research in SA and other emerging economies (du Toit, Kraak, Favish, & Fletcher, ), whereas an online data collection approach was utilized in RO (Bartozik‐Purgat & Filimon, ). In this manner, a diverse range of Gen Y, which included employed, self‐employed, unemployed, and students (aged 18‐32 years old), participated in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaires were distributed via online and paper means to collect the data and were self-administered, which allowed the respondents to be surveyed without assistance. Online data collection was used in Romania, whereas a face-to-face paper questionnaire was distributed, via snowball sampling, in South Africa, owing to the poor response rate of online studies in this country [15,85]. All responses were treated as confidential and the survey was completely anonymous, since no personal or contact particulars were requested.…”
Section: Sampling and Collection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, the CHEC study provides important pointers for subsequent graduate destinations surveys. For example, the use of follow-up telephone interviews can help address selection bias, as they can reach those who do not use email regularly (du Toit et al 2014;du Toit 2016). However, the conditions for conducting these surveys in Kenya and many other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are more challenging than in the Western Cape (South Africa), on account of incomplete student records and lack of administrative capacity, along with a range of other issues.…”
Section: Implications Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%