2016
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.93.062609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From splashing to bouncing: The influence of viscosity on the impact of suspension droplets on a solid surface

Abstract: We experimentally investigated the splashing of dense suspension droplets impacting a solid surface, extending prior work to the regime where the viscosity of the suspending liquid becomes a significant parameter. The overall behavior can be described by a combination of two trends. The first one is that the splashing becomes favored when the kinetic energy of individual particles at the surface of a droplet overcomes the confinement produced by surface tension. This is expressed by a particle-based Weber numb… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macrotexture causes the droplet to split after spreading, pushes the split drops away, leading the dewetting dynamics of the droplet to be quite different than what was observed on surfaces without the macrotextures. Moreover, at this higher impact velocity v = 2 m/s ( We = 71~94), splashing is observed for 0% and 40%, but not for 60% and 70% glycerol-water mixtures, due to suppression of the splashing by viscosity 52 , 53 (Fig. 5b , top).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The macrotexture causes the droplet to split after spreading, pushes the split drops away, leading the dewetting dynamics of the droplet to be quite different than what was observed on surfaces without the macrotextures. Moreover, at this higher impact velocity v = 2 m/s ( We = 71~94), splashing is observed for 0% and 40%, but not for 60% and 70% glycerol-water mixtures, due to suppression of the splashing by viscosity 52 , 53 (Fig. 5b , top).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Since the contact angle affects the strength of the capillary force, here, differently from e.g. [33,34], the variability of the contact angle is taken into account. The bond number Bo (Equation 2), representing the ration of the capillary force to the gravitational force, is also shown along the y-axis as a function the water-ethanol fraction.…”
Section:  Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our demonstration of the validity of the Reynolds-like dilatancy law (4.10) for flow below φ c and the identification of the non-local length scale for estimating the particle stress should help us to better understand the short-time dilation and migration dynamics of suspensions, as observed during impacts (Nicolas 2005;Peters, Xu & Jaeger 2013;Grishaev et al 2015;Boyer et al 2016;Schaarsberg et al 2016), submarine avalanches (Rondon et al 2011;Iverson 2012;Topin et al 2012;Bougouin & Lacaze 2018;Montellà et al 2021), or unsteady two-phase flows in general (Kulkarni et al 2010;Snook et al 2016;Saint-Michel et al 2019;d'Ambrosio et al 2021). For instance, the Darcy-Reynolds model was used successfully to describe the impact of a sphere on a suspension initially prepared above φ c (Jerome et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%