2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34618-8_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Single-Input to Multi-client Inner-Product Functional Encryption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Appendix A, we show that a variant of the compiler of [2, Section 4.2] is secure in the standard model. Recently, Abdalla et al [1] independently obtained a similar result. While their PRF-based compiler [1] can rely on any PRF, we obtain a tighter reduction using a specific PRF described in [56].…”
Section: We Say That An Mcfe Scheme Provides 1ch-ind Security If Formentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Appendix A, we show that a variant of the compiler of [2, Section 4.2] is secure in the standard model. Recently, Abdalla et al [1] independently obtained a similar result. While their PRF-based compiler [1] can rely on any PRF, we obtain a tighter reduction using a specific PRF described in [56].…”
Section: We Say That An Mcfe Scheme Provides 1ch-ind Security If Formentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Recently, Abdalla et al [1] independently obtained a similar result. While their PRF-based compiler [1] can rely on any PRF, we obtain a tighter reduction using a specific PRF described in [56]. Chotard et al [29] additionally show how to enable repetitions by allowing multiple encryption queries for the same pair (i, t).…”
Section: We Say That An Mcfe Scheme Provides 1ch-ind Security If Formentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations