2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7299148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From single image query to detailed 3D reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques generally operate on 10s to 1000s of images. Using such methods, past work has used retrieval and SfM to build a 3D model seeded from a single image [31], or registered a photo to an existing 3D model to transfer depth [40]. However, this work requires either having a detailed 3D model of each location in advance, or building one at run-time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques generally operate on 10s to 1000s of images. Using such methods, past work has used retrieval and SfM to build a 3D model seeded from a single image [31], or registered a photo to an existing 3D model to transfer depth [40]. However, this work requires either having a detailed 3D model of each location in advance, or building one at run-time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We achieve this by exploiting the geometry and the camera positions from 3D models reconstructed automatically by a structure-from-motion (SfM) pipeline. The stateof-the-art retrieval-SfM pipeline [17] takes an unordered image collection as input and attempts to build all possible 3D models. To make the process efficient, fast image clustering is employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incremental SfM pipelines [30,35,26] build a 3D model by initializing the structure from a small seed and gradually growing it by adding additional cameras. This scheme is closer to the requested progressive scenario but, unfortunately, is strongly dependent on the order in which images are added to the model [20,27]. View selection algorithms [33] carefully determine the image order usually by employing the global matching information which is not available in the progressive case.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%