From sensation to cognition

Abstract

Sensory information undergoes extensive associative elaboration and attentional modulation as it becomes incorporated into the texture of cognition. This process occurs along a core synaptic hierarchy which includes the primary sensory, upstream unimodal, downstream unimodal, heteromodal, paralimbic and limbic zones of the cerebral cortex. Connections from one zone to another are reciprocal and allow higher synaptic levels to exert a feedback (top-down) influence upon earlier levels of processing. Each cortical area provides a nexus for the convergence of afferents and divergence of efferents. The resultant synaptic organization supports parallel as well as serial processing, and allows each sensory event to initiate multiple cognitive and behavioural outcomes. Upstream sectors of unimodal association areas encode basic features of sensation such as colour, motion, form and pitch. More complex contents of sensory experience such as objects, faces, word-forms, spatial locations and sound sequences become encoded within downstream sectors of unimodal areas by groups of coarsely tuned neurons. The highest synaptic levels of sensory-fugal processing are occupied by heteromodal, paralimbic and limbic cortices, collectively known as transmodal areas. The unique role of these areas is to bind multiple unimodal and other transmodal areas into distributed but integrated multimodal representations. Transmodal areas in the midtemporal cortex, Wernicke's area, the hippocampal-entorhinal complex and the posterior parietal cortex provide critical gateways for transforming perception into recognition, word-forms into meaning, scenes and events into experiences, and spatial locations into targets for exploration. All cognitive processes arise from analogous associative transformations of similar sets of sensory inputs. The differences in the resultant cognitive operation are determined by the anatomical and physiological properties of the transmodal node that acts as the critical gateway for the dominant transformation. Interconnected sets of transmodal nodes provide anatomical and computational epicentres for large-scale neurocognitive networks. In keeping with the principles of selectively distributed processing, each epicentre of a large-scale network displays a relative specialization for a specific behavioural component of its principal neurospychological domain. The destruction of transmodal epicentres causes global impairments such as multimodal anomia, neglect and amnesia, whereas their selective disconnection from relevant unimodal areas elicits modality-specific impairments such as prosopagnosia, pure word blindness and category-specific anomias. The human brain contains at least five anatomically distinct networks. The network for spatial awareness is based on transmodal epicentres in the posterior parietal cortex and the frontal eye fields; the language network on epicentres in Wernicke's and Broca's areas; the explicit memory/emotion network on epicentres in the hippocampal-entorhinal complex and the amygdala; the f...

Memory encoding and hippocampally-based novelty/familiarity discrimination networks

“…Our present findings, of course, in no way preclude the possibility of the existence of other comparable networks involving other regions of the brain. Finally, the study we have reported here can be seen as contributing to the growing consensus that cognitive processes are mediated by large-scale neural networks [25,28,33,42,43,45,46,48], and to the appreciation of the usefulness of covariance-based analyses [44,59].…”

“…For convenience, we refer to the first as a novelty network and the second as a familiarity network. It is important to note that it is the selectivity of the network for one kind of material but not the other that makes them interesting and distinguishes them from other types of networks that have been previously discussed in the literature [28,33,[42][43][44][45][46].…”

Engaging in Cognitive Activities, Aging, and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Population-Based Study

“…Yet, another potential mechanism pertains to the classic stress model proposed by Sapolsky and colleagues 34 . According to this model, the hippocampus, which is the epicenter of the memory network 35 , has a number of glucocorticoid receptors. These receptors are down regulated in excessively stressful situations.…”

Beyond hypofrontality: A quantitative meta‐analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of working memory in schizophrenia

“…Working memory tasks, like most complex behaviors, activate a spatially distributed large-scale network of cortical and subcortical brain regions [Mesulam, 1998;Smith and Jonides, 1998]. Each of these regions is thought to enjoy a relative functional specialization [Chafee and Goldman-Rakic, 2000;Goldman-Rakic, 1996;Quintana and Fuster, 1999], that can be best considered in terms of a continuum, where several regions may be responsible, to varying degrees, for similar types of processing [O'Reilly et al, 1999].…”