1985
DOI: 10.1177/001440298505200103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From School to Work: A Vocational Transition Model for Handicapped Students

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a three-stage vocational transition model for h~ndicapped youth as they move into adulthood. The model is characterized by the need for secondary programs which reflect a functional curriculum. integrated services. and community-based instruction. The transition process should be initiated weJJ before graduation, should involve parents and adult service representatives. and should be formalized. Postsecondary vocational alternatives should reflect paid employment outcome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirement logically holds education agencies responsible for providing appropriate transition planning through the IEP, secondary education curriculum accommodations and redesign, and interagency coordination to help students and families achieve postsecondary goals. Building upon the historical concepts of career development frameworks (Clark & Kolstoe, 1995;Halpern, 1994;Scharff & Hill, 1976;Ward & Halloran, 1993 ;Wehman, Kregel, Barcus, & Schalock, 1986;Will, 1986), Kohler (1998) characterized the high school years as requiring a "transition perspective" for education of youth with disabilities. Kochhar-Bryant and Bassett (2002) referred to transition as a "unifying framework" for aligning standardsbased education and transition services (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Transition As a Unifying Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement logically holds education agencies responsible for providing appropriate transition planning through the IEP, secondary education curriculum accommodations and redesign, and interagency coordination to help students and families achieve postsecondary goals. Building upon the historical concepts of career development frameworks (Clark & Kolstoe, 1995;Halpern, 1994;Scharff & Hill, 1976;Ward & Halloran, 1993 ;Wehman, Kregel, Barcus, & Schalock, 1986;Will, 1986), Kohler (1998) characterized the high school years as requiring a "transition perspective" for education of youth with disabilities. Kochhar-Bryant and Bassett (2002) referred to transition as a "unifying framework" for aligning standardsbased education and transition services (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Transition As a Unifying Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wehman et al ( 1985) suggested adding to the team an adult service system representative and possibly an employer. The employer would be chosen to represent the perspectives of other employers and to describe the most important general characteristics that employers evaluate in hiring, retaining, and advancing their employees.…”
Section: Participants In Transition Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other writers (e.g., Halpern, 1985;Wehman, Kregel, & Barcus, 1985) challenged the federal perspective as articulated by . Halpern argued that the appropriate outcome target should be community adjustment and that employment is only one index of the level of that adjustment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the career education movement was never fully implemented on a national basis (R. Sitlington, Clark, & Kolstoe, 2000 Interpersonal, and Employment areas of student and adult life. Wehman, Kregel, and Barcus (1985) outlined a series of steps for a successful transition that same year. Halpern (1993) added the Quality of Life component to Will's model for students with disabilities, and the focus on outcomes had begun.…”
Section: Program Evaluation In Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the growing awareness of these issues, research on the transition process has increased dramatically in recent years (e.g., Baer, 1996;Baer, Simmons, & Flexer, 1996;Blackorby & Wagner, 1996Fourqurean & LaCourt, 1990;Hughes, Eisenman, Hwang, Kim, Killian, & Scott, 1997;Kohler, 1993;Wehman, Kregel, & Barcus, 1985;Wehmeyer, 1992;Yesseldyke, Thurlow, & Gilman, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%