Public Administration Evolving 2015
DOI: 10.4324/9781315718958-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Sameness to Differentness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The social equity literature prior to 2018 began to evince paired dynamics, namely linking social equity to related concepts and drawing from other fields. On the first dynamic, scholarly works began linking concepts of diversity, cultural competency, inclusion, methodologies and philosophies of knowledge, representative bureaucracy, and emotional labor to equity issues, noting that these concepts were all necessary, albeit not sufficient, conditions for understanding and fostering fairness for all (see Guy & McCandless, 2012;Guy et al, 2008;Norman-Major & Gooden, 2012;Riccucci, 2010;Riccucci, 2015;Riccucci & Van Ryzin, 2017). On the second dynamic, scholars in public administration began drawing more often from other literatures, whether explicitly or implicitly, in other fields to bring new analytical tools to the field, especially regarding feminism and queer theory (Swan, 2004), critical race theory (Alkadry & Blessett, 2010;Gaynor, 2018), theories of justice (Federickson, 2010;Rawls, 1971), and intersectionality (Blessett, 2018;Love et al, 2016).…”
Section: Toward Greater Conceptual and Operational Claritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social equity literature prior to 2018 began to evince paired dynamics, namely linking social equity to related concepts and drawing from other fields. On the first dynamic, scholarly works began linking concepts of diversity, cultural competency, inclusion, methodologies and philosophies of knowledge, representative bureaucracy, and emotional labor to equity issues, noting that these concepts were all necessary, albeit not sufficient, conditions for understanding and fostering fairness for all (see Guy & McCandless, 2012;Guy et al, 2008;Norman-Major & Gooden, 2012;Riccucci, 2010;Riccucci, 2015;Riccucci & Van Ryzin, 2017). On the second dynamic, scholars in public administration began drawing more often from other literatures, whether explicitly or implicitly, in other fields to bring new analytical tools to the field, especially regarding feminism and queer theory (Swan, 2004), critical race theory (Alkadry & Blessett, 2010;Gaynor, 2018), theories of justice (Federickson, 2010;Rawls, 1971), and intersectionality (Blessett, 2018;Love et al, 2016).…”
Section: Toward Greater Conceptual and Operational Claritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a relatively small literature base on FRD, focusing mostly on legal theories and employment claims (see, for example, Albiston et al, 2008; Bornstein, 2012; Still, 2008; Williams & Bornstein, 2006, 2008). Also, FRD is cited as one of the three areas for research where “greater progress is needed” in the public sector (Riccucci, 2015, p. 197). Very few empirical studies have examined FRD from the perspective of employer practices or policies.…”
Section: Frdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams, as well as her colleagues, transcended the norms of the time by maintaining racial data beyond that which was explicitly required (Gooding ). In fact, scholars who examine demographic representation in the federal sector typically provide data comparisons starting in the 1960s, after the passage of Title VII of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex, race color, national origin, and religion and applied to all federal, state, and local governments (see, e.g., Riccucci ). Williams achieved at least 13 percent African American employment at the OPA in 1945, almost 20 years prior to passage of the Civil Rights Act.…”
Section: Williams Social Equity and The Opamentioning
confidence: 99%