2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-012-0352-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From “ready to wear” to “custom-made”: the benefits of multidimensional approaches to tailor targeted interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Internal reliability for the SDQ subscales varied from good to very low reliability: emotional symptoms (α = .70), conduct problems (α = .53), hyperactivity/inattention (α = .47), peer relationship problems (α = .26), and prosocial behavior (α = .61). The range of internal reliability estimates is broadly consistent with previous work on the scale (e.g., Colins et al, 2013), and the particularly low internal reliability for the conduct problems and peer relationship problems is consistent with youth samples in Japan (Moriwaki and Kamio, 2014), China (Mellor et al, 2011), and multicultural samples in the Netherlands (Colins et al, 2013; Mieloo et al, 2014). Past work suggests that differences in cultural reports of youth behavior may influence caretaker reports, particular in cross-cultural or minority group samples (Mieloo et al, 2014), thereby influencing reliability estimates.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Internal reliability for the SDQ subscales varied from good to very low reliability: emotional symptoms (α = .70), conduct problems (α = .53), hyperactivity/inattention (α = .47), peer relationship problems (α = .26), and prosocial behavior (α = .61). The range of internal reliability estimates is broadly consistent with previous work on the scale (e.g., Colins et al, 2013), and the particularly low internal reliability for the conduct problems and peer relationship problems is consistent with youth samples in Japan (Moriwaki and Kamio, 2014), China (Mellor et al, 2011), and multicultural samples in the Netherlands (Colins et al, 2013; Mieloo et al, 2014). Past work suggests that differences in cultural reports of youth behavior may influence caretaker reports, particular in cross-cultural or minority group samples (Mieloo et al, 2014), thereby influencing reliability estimates.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 84%