The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
The Culture and Politics of Contemporary Street Gang Memoirs 2012
DOI: 10.14325/mississippi/9781617032813.003.0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Rage to Rap and Prison to Print

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rodriguez and his narrative are elevated to the literary canon and the other memoirist, despite his criminal inclinations, is lauded by these reviewers for becoming a published author. Moreover, though I have argued elsewhere that these books can potentially be seen as part of a wider gangsta movement (both black and Latino), there is a notable absence in the reception of these memoirs of comparison with gangsta rap or ghetto films of the late 1980s and early 1990s (Metcalf, 2009). I was surprised that hiphop magazines such as Vibe and The Source , arguably read by dedicated fans of hiphop and gangsta music, did not review either of these memoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodriguez and his narrative are elevated to the literary canon and the other memoirist, despite his criminal inclinations, is lauded by these reviewers for becoming a published author. Moreover, though I have argued elsewhere that these books can potentially be seen as part of a wider gangsta movement (both black and Latino), there is a notable absence in the reception of these memoirs of comparison with gangsta rap or ghetto films of the late 1980s and early 1990s (Metcalf, 2009). I was surprised that hiphop magazines such as Vibe and The Source , arguably read by dedicated fans of hiphop and gangsta music, did not review either of these memoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%