2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02686322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From race to citizenship: The indigenization debate in post-socialist Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be the result of a carryover effect from the early independence period, when residents desired dual citizenship status in the newly independent state as well as in the European state. Interestingly, these policies have persisted broadly over time in many states, despite well‐publicized conflicts over citizenship in specific countries (Aminzade 2003; Larson and Aminzade 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be the result of a carryover effect from the early independence period, when residents desired dual citizenship status in the newly independent state as well as in the European state. Interestingly, these policies have persisted broadly over time in many states, despite well‐publicized conflicts over citizenship in specific countries (Aminzade 2003; Larson and Aminzade 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, local politics take on greater significance as the world polity does not provide a univocal normative stance on the right of the individual to dual citizenship. In some states, such as Tanzania, dual citizenship may be interpreted as the continuation of imperialism (Aminzade 2003). In other locales, such as in the case of Turk guest workers in Germany, dual citizenship is perceived as a means of granting essential political rights in a democracy (Miller 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depoliticised ethnicity in Tanzania: a structural and historical narrative CCM's nationalistic posture even made it possible to hold back heightened racial as well as anti-foreign hostilities in post-socialist Tanzania. This was laid bare when the opposition parties led by the Chair of the Democratic Party (DP) Reverend Christopher Mtikila mobilised support by denouncing Asian-Tanzaniansmagabacholi 15 and demanding preferential legislation for wazawa 16 (Aminzade, 2003). In his racial nationalistic plea for political support Mtikila targeted magabacholi as disloyal outsiders who are exploiting the nation for their own benefit at the expense of walala hoi 17 (Campbell, 1999).…”
Section: Sustained Nationhood Under Liberal Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other opposition party leaders, including 1995 National Convention for Construction and Reform (NCCR)‐Maguezi Presidential candidate Augustine Mrema, joined in calling for racially based indigenization policies. The government responded to calls for such policies, and to the success of opposition parties in mobilizing support around the issue, by redefining the meaning of nonindigenous from Asian‐Tanzanian citizens to foreigners, thus shifting the target of exclusion from the nation's internal to its external other (Aminzade ).…”
Section: Neoliberal‐era Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%