Peirce's Doctrine of Signs 1996
DOI: 10.1515/9783110873450.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From pure icon to metaphor: Six degrees of iconicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the feature of icon varies according to the degree of iconicity from concrete to abstract (see Braga 1996). However, the feature of icon varies according to the degree of iconicity from concrete to abstract (see Braga 1996).…”
Section: From Index To Icon: Concrete or Abstract?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the feature of icon varies according to the degree of iconicity from concrete to abstract (see Braga 1996). However, the feature of icon varies according to the degree of iconicity from concrete to abstract (see Braga 1996).…”
Section: From Index To Icon: Concrete or Abstract?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first instance of musical representation is at the pure icon level: music as icon of itself and music as a matrix of acoustic icons (see Santaella [1988] for more on this issue). Music, from this point of view, is just 'an affair of suchness'.…”
Section: Music As Pure Iconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iconic signs appear in complex and variegated forms in music. Thus, to employ iconicity properly as an analytic instrument, one should consider the divisions of the concept of icon (see Santaella 1989 and1991: 136-137). Besides pure and actual icons, hypoicons in music are extremely important.…”
Section: Music As Pure Iconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To contribute to the clarification of these relations will be a central theme of this paper. To some degree, this criticism also affects much of the literature focusing on Peirce's semiotic taxonomy [19,[23][24][25][26][27]. Nonetheless, beyond classificatory concerns, there is by now also a substantial body of literature addressing hypoiconicity in art [20,21,[28][29][30]), on embodiment [31][32][33], in relation to iconicity and metaphor [20,21,[34][35][36]), on diagrammatic reasoning as such [37][38][39]), on architecture [40], as well as cartooning [41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%