INTRODUCTIONThree major social processes took place in Europe and the Mediterranean in the flrst millennium AD: the decline of classical antiquity, the rise of Western Europe, and the integration of the barbarian world with mainstream de velopments (79). Each of these processes has been illuminated by both written historical sources and the material remains of the past as studied by archaeology; but the investigation of the flrst millennium AD is still far from being an integrated one. Opposing schools of research, in particular script history and general archaeology, but also art history, the history of religion, philosophy and literature, the history of law, linguistics, etc, strive to come to terms with the period. Even within archaeology, for example, the problems dealt with and the scientiflc language spoken in classical archaeology are very different from those of general archaeology. Research traditions-be they rooted in different data, regions of study, or approaches-are paramount in the investigation of the flrst millennium AD. Furthermore, as this period constitutes the rise of the pre-modem world in Europe, these differences among researchers also have strong overtones of moral philosophy, ideology, Eurocentrism, chauvinism, etc. In short, we are dealing with an academic 227