2022
DOI: 10.7202/1088440ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Policy-Practice to Means-Ends Decoupling in Organizations: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional theory posits that organizations conform to forces in their institutional environment in order to gain legitimacy, improve their social image and improve their competitive position. Nevertheless, their internal policies and practices may not be actually observed-a phenomenon identified as policy-practice decoupling (Jabbouri et al, 2019). This divide between the proclaimed and the practiced occurs because it serves the interests of powerful executives and leaders and preserves their discretion over the allocation of resources (Westphal and Zajac, 2001, p. 206); it may also be the result of avoiding compliance costs (Kingston and Caballero, 2009).…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Institutional theory posits that organizations conform to forces in their institutional environment in order to gain legitimacy, improve their social image and improve their competitive position. Nevertheless, their internal policies and practices may not be actually observed-a phenomenon identified as policy-practice decoupling (Jabbouri et al, 2019). This divide between the proclaimed and the practiced occurs because it serves the interests of powerful executives and leaders and preserves their discretion over the allocation of resources (Westphal and Zajac, 2001, p. 206); it may also be the result of avoiding compliance costs (Kingston and Caballero, 2009).…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, disclosure comes as a response to the "public expectations regarding organizational transparency" (Wehmeier and Raaz, 2012, p. 339), which is equated with sharing of information (Albu and Flyverbom, 2019). The coercive pressure refers to "the force of laws and regulations regarding CSR and the dissemination of information" (Cubilla-Montilla et al, 2020, p. 1184; therefore, organizations disclose their information in order to evade control, monitoring, and sanctions (Jabbouri et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on extensive literature reviews (Bromley and Powell, 2012; Jabbouri et al. , 2022), the literature has recently identified a second form of decoupling with particular empirical evidence in sustainability research (Stål and Corvellec, 2022; Wijen, 2014).…”
Section: Decoupling Accusations Reflecting the Current Legitimacy Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on extensive literature reviews (Bromley and Powell, 2012;Jabbouri et al, 2022), the literature has recently identified a second form of decoupling with particular empirical evidence in sustainability research (St al and Corvellec, 2022;Wijen, 2014). This line of scholarship argues that, because of extended public scrutiny and pressure, established routines of policy-practice decoupling are complemented and replaced by means-ends decoupling.…”
Section: Decoupling Accusations Reflecting the Current Legitimacy Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this study has shown, despite deploying significant resources, organizations nowadays continue to face difficulties in balancing political-management tensions. The phenomenon of means-ends decoupling is critical in unraveling the larger phenomenon of institutional decoupling [27,[81][82][83]. As we have seen, the balance between incentives and deterrents for action is not always an easy task.…”
Section: Mitigating Decoupling and Shared Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%