From Place-Memories to Active Citizenship: The Potential of Geotagged User-Generated Content for Memory Scholarship

Arrigoni, Gabriella; Galani, Areti

doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_8

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Frequent attention ( N = 22 works) was dedicated to the legacy of WW2 in Europe (Arrigoni and Galani, 2019a, 2019b; Baumann, 2020; Birkner and Donk, 2020; Braun, 2016; Brentin, 2016; Damcevic and Rodik, 2018; Dobysh, 2019; Kaprāns, 2016; Khlevnyuk, 2019; Kist, 2020; Koskinen-Koivisto, 2019; Makhortykh, 2018; Makhortykh, 2020; Matila, 2021; Pogačar, 2011; Rutten, 2013; Sawczuk, 2020; Wells, 2016). Some studies focused on specific WW2-related topics, such as the Ustaše regime in Croatia between 1929 and 1945 (Brentin, 2016), the Finnish war (Matila, 2021), D-Day (Braun, 2016) and the Battle of Kyiv (Makhortykh, 2020).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Many works drew from memory studies by using two classic notions: Maurice Halbwachs’s ‘collective memory’ (Arrigoni and Galani, 2019a; Birkner and Donk, 2020; Brentin, 2016; Heimo, 2017; Khlevnyuk, 2019; Liu, 2018; Zhao and Liu, 2015) and Pierre Nora’s ‘lieux de mémoire’ (Arrigoni and Galani, 2019b; Baumann, 2020; Carter, 2015; Drinot, 2011; Farrell-Banks, 2019; Heimo, 2017; Ibrahim, 2016; Knudsen, 2016; Knudsen and Stage, 2013; Liboriussen and Martin, 2020; Zhao and Liu, 2015). Building on Pierre Nora, one study attached ‘memory to sites which are material as well as immaterial’, perceiving the Internet ‘as an immaterial space’ (Ibrahim, 2016); another critiqued Nora’s concept as single-layered and proposed instead to focus ‘on geolocative content’ of place ‘as the site of lived experience’ (Arrigoni and Galani, 2019b). Collective memory was also related to the notion of the construction of national identity (Farrell-Banks, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two related terms, participation and crowdsourcing, considered as mechanisms for creating multiple interpretive perspectives and communicative realities, were illustrated in studies of conflicting stories of South Africa (Bosch, 2020), the Kashmir uprising (Osuri, 2019), intangible heritage in Turkey (Pietrobruno, 2014), Cambodia (Benzaquen, 2014), Rhodesia (Kirkegaard, 2017) and Poland (Arrigoni and Galani, 2019a). Second, there were several references to the notion of the ‘public sphere’, not only in its initial theorisation by Jürgen Habermas (Arrigoni and Galani, 2019b; Bonacchi et al, 2018; Knudsen and Andersen, 2019; Mylonas, 2017), but also considering the views of critics such as Nancy Fraser, Douglas Kellner or Todd Gitlin (Bosch, 2020; Mylonas, 2017).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Difficult heritage on social network sites: An integrative review

Kelpšienė¹,

Armakauskaitė²,

Denisenko³

et al. 2022

New Media & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social network sites (SNS) have recently become an active ground for interactions on contested and dissonant heritage, on the heritage of excluded and subaltern groups, and on the heritage of collective traumatic past events. Situated at the intersection between heritage studies, memory studies, Holocaust studies, social media studies and digital heritage studies, a growing body of scholarly literature has been emerging in the past 10 years, addressing online communication practices on SNS. This study, an integrative review of a comprehensive corpus of 80 scholarly works about difficult heritage on SNS, identifies the profile of authors contributing to this emerging area of research, the increasing frequency of publication after 2017, the prevalence of qualitative research methods, the global geographic dispersion of heritage addressed, and the emergence of common themes and concepts derived mostly from the authors ‘home’ fields of memory studies, heritage studies and (digital) media studies.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Difficult heritage on social network sites: An integrative review

Kelpšienė¹,

Armakauskaitė²,

Denisenko³

et al. 2022

New Media & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Geographies of Commemoration in a Digital World

Drozdzewski

Sumartojo

Waterton

2021

Geographies of Commemoration in a Digital World

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sharing ‘memories’ on Instagram

Annabell

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the performance of remembered experience within sharing in-the-moment carried out by young women on Instagram. I propose that the small stories analytical framework provides a way to examine at a micro level sharing of ‘memories’ online by addressing practices of selecting the past, showing and telling the past and interacting with the past in digital traces. For digital memory studies, this moves beyond a focus on affordances and infrastructure transformed memory and the examination of how people engage with memories that have been predefined. The analysis demonstrates how the performance of remembered experience is displayed and positioned across the interplay of past, present and future. Young women’s sharing in-the-moment reconfigures the function and meanings of ‘memories’ beyond the platform’s mobilisation of the term. It is part of how they express feelings and experiences about their unfolding lives.

show abstract

From Place-Memories to Active Citizenship: The Potential of Geotagged User-Generated Content for Memory Scholarship

Cited by 4 publications

References 31 publications

Difficult heritage on social network sites: An integrative review

Difficult heritage on social network sites: An integrative review

Geographies of Commemoration in a Digital World

Sharing ‘memories’ on Instagram

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About