2014
DOI: 10.1080/1472586x.2014.862994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From photographs to findings: visual meaning-making and interpretive engagement in the analysis of participant-generated images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
128
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Our theoretical framework was constructed after finalizing a thorough analysis of the data, to preserve our inductive approach. Photographs and texts exist in an integrated and mutually enhancing relationship, and each of them extends our understanding of the other (Berger, 2013;Drew & Guillemin, 2014;Rapport, Doel, & Elwyn, 2007;Rugg, 1997). All our participants explicitly related their text to their photographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our theoretical framework was constructed after finalizing a thorough analysis of the data, to preserve our inductive approach. Photographs and texts exist in an integrated and mutually enhancing relationship, and each of them extends our understanding of the other (Berger, 2013;Drew & Guillemin, 2014;Rapport, Doel, & Elwyn, 2007;Rugg, 1997). All our participants explicitly related their text to their photographs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photographs and texts can be analysed as 'stand-alone' products, but in addition, each can extend our understanding of the other (Drew & Guillemin, 2014;Rapport, Doel and Elwyn, 2007;Rugg, 1997). During the analysis, we treated each participant's contribution as one story, presented through textual and visual means.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] To this Drew & Guillemin add that images "may have multiple meanings, that may change over time, or indeed remain relatively stable." [12] For them, as well as for the other authors mentioned, meaning generation is a co-construction that involves the image, the participants, the researches and the context.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12], [13] From there, we set 6 different variables that enable us to measure the difference between the "description" and the "interpretation" of the photo by participants. Categories considered the difference in terms of adding context: (i.e.…”
Section: Visual Analysis Of Selected Photosmentioning
confidence: 99%