2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
139
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
139
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is particularly well understood in ants, where such a mechanism leads to robustness and optimality in foraging response (25,26). For ants, however, the aim is to maximize group-level fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly well understood in ants, where such a mechanism leads to robustness and optimality in foraging response (25,26). For ants, however, the aim is to maximize group-level fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small initial differences in recruitment can arise by chance, or may be due to differential recruitment as a result of resource quality [2,[4][5][6][7][8] or other factors [9][10][11]. Such positive feedback loops lead to rapid group-level decisions, but can result in colonies becoming 'trapped' in suboptimal decisions, as the signal to one food source becomes too strong to be overcome [6,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foragers modulating their pheromone deposition according to food quality can help ant colonies avoid being trapped at a less rewarding site when a more rewarding one is available (de Biseau et al, 1991;Nicolis and Deneubourg, 1999;Sumpter and Beekman, 2003). Despite this, in mass recruiting species such as Lasius niger, colonies may be unable to switch to a more rewarding site which is found later (Beckers et al, 1990).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscript 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment along a pheromone trail and choice at a trail bifurcation have been modelled using differential equations (Beckers et al, 1992a;Goss et al, 1989;Nicolis and Deneubourg, 1999;Pasteels et al, 1987;Sumpter and Beekman, 2003) and using agentbased models Edelstein-Keshet et al, 1995;Haefner and Crist, 1994;Stickland et al, 1992;Stickland et al, 1993). However, these models have assumed that mass recruitment involves just one type of trail pheromone, a positive attractive one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%