2022
DOI: 10.4171/jems/1198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From non-defectivity to identifiability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. If π X g : sec g (X) → P N is of fiber type then τ g−1 is of fiber type, see for instance [CM,Lemma16 (i)], and we conclude, by Theorem 24, that X is not identifiable.…”
Section: Noether-fano Inequalities and Generic Identifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof. If π X g : sec g (X) → P N is of fiber type then τ g−1 is of fiber type, see for instance [CM,Lemma16 (i)], and we conclude, by Theorem 24, that X is not identifiable.…”
Section: Noether-fano Inequalities and Generic Identifiabilitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Proof. The variety X is non defective and not (g − 1)-twd Therefore, by [CM,Theorem 18] the tangential projection τ g−2 , from {x 2 , . .…”
Section: Properties Of Contact Locus For Non Twd Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.1 (Casarotti and Mella [10]). Let V ⊂ P n be an irreducible, nondegenerate projective variety that is not 1-twd.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for all n. The main contribution of this paper consists of leveraging the main results of [10,15,37,51] to tackle the second question on the number of Chow decompositions (CD) for cubics. In particular, we prove that for almost all subgeneric ranks r ≤ r gen there exists a Zariski-open subset of σ r (C 3,n ) such that the cubics in that set admit a unique expression as in (CD), up to the order of the summands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before trying to answer these questions, recall that the Chow decomposition is a generalization of another famous polynomial (or, equivalently, symmetric tensor) decomposition: by taking L 0,j = • • • = L d−1,j in (CD) we obtain the Waring [30,34] or symmetric tensor rank decomposition [18], which was already studied by Clebsch, Sylvester, Palatini, and Terracini in the 19th and first half of the 20th century; see [8] for historical remarks. After a century-long journey in projective algebraic geometry starting in earnest with Palatini's 1903 paper [38], the necessary tools, such as those in [3,10,[12][13][14]48], were developed to study foregoing questions. For the Waring decomposition, the first question was answered by Alexander and Hirschowitz [3] in 1995, and the second was completely resolved by 2019 through the combined works of Ballico [5], Chiantini, Ottaviani, and Vannieuwenhoven [17], and Galuppi and Mella [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%