2011
DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2011.599588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From national monopoly to multinational corporation: How regulation shaped the road towards telecommunications internationalisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike the case with PPPs, thus far SIB designers have not addressed the concerns internationalization might create for managing the contracts. Internationalization and liberalization have created challenges for managing public service monopolies and contractors (Gerbasi and Warner 2007;Clifton, Comin, and Diaz-Fuentes 2011). Recent scholarly research has led to more thoughtful analysis of the welfare propositions that should govern contracting (Del Bo and Florio 2012;Florio 2013), but SIB's primary welfare consideration is attracting investment to a successful model program.…”
Section: Public Private Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike the case with PPPs, thus far SIB designers have not addressed the concerns internationalization might create for managing the contracts. Internationalization and liberalization have created challenges for managing public service monopolies and contractors (Gerbasi and Warner 2007;Clifton, Comin, and Diaz-Fuentes 2011). Recent scholarly research has led to more thoughtful analysis of the welfare propositions that should govern contracting (Del Bo and Florio 2012;Florio 2013), but SIB's primary welfare consideration is attracting investment to a successful model program.…”
Section: Public Private Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second main explanation for SOE internationalization emerged in the 1980s and 1990s, particularly in the literature on pro-market reforms (Cerny, 1997;Clifton Comín, & Díaz-Fuentes, 2011;Cuervo-Cazurra & Dau, 2009;Dau, 2012). Pro-market reforms are institutional changes made by the state that were first implemented in the United Kingdom by Margaret Thatcher, and then conducted in several other developed and developing countries (Musacchio & Flores-Macias, 2009;North, 1990).…”
Section: View 2: Pro-market Reforms As Incentives To Soe Internationamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the higher expectations of private stockholders, even in cases they are the minority, SOEs are forced to enhance internal management and performance (Gupta, 2005) and respond to the competition by seeking more profitable international markets (Clifton et al, 2011).…”
Section: View 2: Pro-market Reforms As Incentives To Soe Internationamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cawley (2013), more specifically, investigates how this regulatory mode has helped to develop both mobile and broadband communications and shows that liberalisation has been more effective in the mobile sector. Clifton, Comín, and Díaz-Fuentes (2011), among others, demonstrate how liberalisation, along with privatisation and the introduction of competition into markets, has enabled some of the former state owned incumbent operators to expand their spatial reach and emerge as multinational companies. In contrast, Belloc, Nicita, and Parcu (2013) empirically investigate the nature and outcomes of liberalisation and show the importance of NRAs in this process.…”
Section: Market Liberalisation In the Telecommunications Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%