2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From natalizumab to fingolimod in eight weeks — Immunological, clinical, and radiological data in quest of the optimal switch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found no significant difference in concentration under natalizumab treatment when comparing patients with disease activity and patients without disease activity, which is in agreement with a recently published study of 12 patients switching from natalizumab to fingolimod. 26 In our study, the possible explanation could be that the clinical disease activity appeared after 3 months of natalizumab discontinuation when concentration of the drug had already decreased under therapeutic levels. 5 When comparing longitudinal natalizumab concentration in patients with and without disease activity, the mean concentration at 3 months was lower in patients who did not experience disease activity (0.8 vs 4.2 µg/mL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, we found no significant difference in concentration under natalizumab treatment when comparing patients with disease activity and patients without disease activity, which is in agreement with a recently published study of 12 patients switching from natalizumab to fingolimod. 26 In our study, the possible explanation could be that the clinical disease activity appeared after 3 months of natalizumab discontinuation when concentration of the drug had already decreased under therapeutic levels. 5 When comparing longitudinal natalizumab concentration in patients with and without disease activity, the mean concentration at 3 months was lower in patients who did not experience disease activity (0.8 vs 4.2 µg/mL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…According to other authors [71,72,73], we think it is important to analyse in larger cohorts of patients the immunological consequences of natalizumab discontinuation, in order to find out a useful biomarker for an effective therapeutic switch. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that Th17 and IL-17 levels increased during prolonged natalizumab treatment, returned to baseline levels after withdrawal and resulted almost undetectable in patients who experienced relapses during the natalizumab washout period [72]. Looking for a biomarker for a safe and effective change from natalizumab to fingolimod, Harrer and colleagues [73] monitored five parameters related to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the two therapies; they studied 12 MS patients previously treated with natalizumab (for at least 12 months) during the eight-week wash out period and the six months of fingolimod treatment. The authors found an high interindividual variability and the only linkage with MS reactivation was an higher frequencies of memory CD8 lymphocytes after six months on fingolimod, thus, none of the analyzed parameters showed a potential role as a prognostic biomarker for the outcome of the switch [73].…”
Section: Literature Review Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, we could show statistical significant differences in natalizumab cell-bound levels between different treatment intervals (natalizumab saturation after 4 weeks is 64%, after 5 weeks is 55.2%, and after 8 weeks is 34%), while higher interindividual differences occur with longer treatment intervals. Harrer et al 9 could demonstrate higher natalizumab saturation levels after a 8-week treatment holiday in 12 patients (CD8 cells, 57%; interquartile range, 26%–64% and CD4 cells, 67%; interquartile range, 38%–69%) with high interindividual variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%