2006
DOI: 10.1116/1.2375089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From nanoscale displacement sensing and estimation to nanoscale alignment

Abstract: In this article, the authors present theoretical background and practical procedures for linking displacement sensing and estimation to nanoscale alignment. The authors discuss the application of nanoscale displacement sensing and estimation (nDSE)-based overlay metrology tool. The authors propose a new look at what constitutes displacement and alignment. From there, the authors develop several frameworks to bridge these two concepts based on a set of new pseudodisplacement concepts and on the careful selectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach is to oversample images, but this method increases the computing load dramatically. Authors like Douglas [ 3 ] and Gao et al [ 4 ] use a direct measurement in the frequency domain and, through combination with statistical methods, obtain respectively 3- ó precisions around 5 nm and 3 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to oversample images, but this method increases the computing load dramatically. Authors like Douglas [ 3 ] and Gao et al [ 4 ] use a direct measurement in the frequency domain and, through combination with statistical methods, obtain respectively 3- ó precisions around 5 nm and 3 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, this kind of method has been implemented by Moddemeijer (1991), reporting a resolution of 13.3 nm. Also, authors like Douglas (1993) and Gao et al (2006) have combined correlation with statistical methods. As a result, resolutions around the 10 nm and 1 nm, respectively, were achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both feature-based and area-based methods have been used at the micro-scale but area-based methods are preferred because they are more accurate and more robust to noises [ 15 ]. Area-based methods like least squares can achieve nanometer resolutions using regular 20x microscopes [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Nevertheless, the measurement range is limited to the field of view, limiting computer vision position sensing of micro-objects to microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%