2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From mixed flow reactor to column experiments and modeling: Upscaling of calcite dissolution rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where B is a constant. The rate equation has been used to explain the dissolution behaviors of albite, gibbsite, labradorite, and smectite [56], and, more recently, calcite [133]. For oxide glasses, due to the lack of long-range order [51], similar defects may not exist.…”
Section: Dissolution Rate As the Solution Approaches Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where B is a constant. The rate equation has been used to explain the dissolution behaviors of albite, gibbsite, labradorite, and smectite [56], and, more recently, calcite [133]. For oxide glasses, due to the lack of long-range order [51], similar defects may not exist.…”
Section: Dissolution Rate As the Solution Approaches Saturationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, VSI dissolution rates have been measured by [54] using a mixed flow set-up and slightly carbonated fluids with saturation states in relation to calcite close to zero. The authors [54], obtained a mean rate of the same order of magnitude (≈0.5 µmol•m −2 •s −1 ) as the rates measured here. The set-up used a high hydraulic residence time (200 min) that could result in diffusion effects and lower dissolution rates, but has been compensated by using stirring rates.…”
Section: Relevance To Previous Research and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcite is a common mineral in the Earth's crust and is characterized by significant dynamics of its surface, depending on environmental conditions (e.g., Fischer et al, 2012; Jordan & Rammensee, 1998; Noiriel et al, 2009, 2020). Acquisition of the type of data we consider is subject to increased interest to characterize microscale geochemical processes deriving from interactions taking place at fluid‐rock interfaces (e.g., Bouissonnié et al, 2018; Pollet‐Villard, Daval, Ackerer, et al, 2016; Pollet‐Villard, Daval, Fritz, et al, 2016, and references therein). While the possibility of acquiring these direct observations is continuously enhanced through the use of modern atomic force microscopy and vertical scanning interferometry, statistical analyses of available data sets are still limited to standard variography (Pollet‐Villard, Daval, Ackerer, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%