From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: Comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs

Abstract

Objectives. Behaviour change technique (BCT) Taxonomy v1 is a hierarchically grouped, consensus-based taxonomy of 93 BCTs for reporting intervention content. To enhance the use and understanding of BCTs, the aims of the present study were to (1) quantitatively examine the 'bottom-up' hierarchical structure of Taxonomy v1, (2) identify whether BCTs can be reliably mapped to theoretical domains using a 'top-down' theoretically driven approach, and (3) identify any overlap between the 'bottom-up' and 'top-down' groupings.Methods and design. The 'bottom-up' structure was examined for higher-order groupings using a dendrogram derived from hierarchical cluster analysis. For the theory-based 'top-down' structure, 18 experts sorted BCTs into 14 theoretical domains. Discriminant Content Validity was used to identify groupings, and chi-square tests and Pearson's residuals were used to examine the overlap between groupings.Results. Behaviour change techniques relating to 'Reward and Punishment' and 'Cues and Cue Responses' were perceived as markedly different to other BCTs. Fifty-nine of the BCTs were reliably allocated to 12 of the 14 theoretical domains; 47 were significant and 12 were of borderline significance. Thirty-four of 208 'bottom-up' 9 'top-down' pairings showed greater overlap than expected by chance. However, only six combinations achieved satisfactory evidence of similarity.Conclusions. The moderate overlap between the groupings indicates some tendency to implicitly conceptualize BCTs in terms of the same theoretical domains. Understanding the nature of the overlap will aid the conceptualization of BCTs in terms of theory and application. Further research into different methods of developing a hierarchical taxonomic structure of BCTs for international, interdisciplinary work is now required.

A prospective study exploring the construct and predictive validity of the COM-B model for physical activity

“…Motivation was an important mediator of the influence of Capability which turned out to be the key driver of MVPA for healthy adults, and so both constructs should be promising targets for an intervention aimed at encouraging or maintaining physical activity. Recent work has begun to show how TDF domains can be linked to individual BCTs (Cane et al, 2015), and identified those BCTs that are included in effective interventions for inactive adults (Howlett et al, 2015).…”

A Case Study Investigation into the Use of Multi-compartment Compliance Aids in Older People Resident in Very Sheltered Housing

“…One benefit of the theoretical focus of this research is that specific behavioural determinants can be linked to change strategies and indeed evidence suggests that TDF-based interviews may encourage respondents to identify barriers that they would not otherwise disclose [28]. Cane et al have aligned behaviour change techniques mapped to TDF behavioural determinants as an aid to characterising and designing behaviour change interventions [29]. For example, while information provision via education and training may be relevant to change knowledge and skills, altering beliefs of consequences may require persuasive communication and monitoring the consequences of one's own behaviour.…”

Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data)

“…73 However, it is not only the content and form of the taxonomy that drives reliable and valid application of BCT labels/definitions but also the extent to which the user has been trained to use the taxonomy. Identifying (coding) BCTs involves a deductive process of categorising qualitative information (e.g.…”