2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From large to small: Reorienting rural development policies in response to climate change, food security and poverty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined effects of deforestation and forest degradation threaten the maintenance of critical ecosystem services, including carbon storage and sequestration and the conservation of hydrological cycles, as well as the protection of globally significant biodiversity (2,3). Much of the land already cleared for farming is poorly used (4), and despite the economic growth often associated with converting forests to farmland, many inhabitants of the Amazon continue to live in poverty (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined effects of deforestation and forest degradation threaten the maintenance of critical ecosystem services, including carbon storage and sequestration and the conservation of hydrological cycles, as well as the protection of globally significant biodiversity (2,3). Much of the land already cleared for farming is poorly used (4), and despite the economic growth often associated with converting forests to farmland, many inhabitants of the Amazon continue to live in poverty (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the smart family fruit farms became more and more important for the rural economy by increasing the efficient use of local resources, by offering social security and comfort and by reducing the environmental fruit finger print [7]. Smallholder fruit farmers are extremely important for the economy of the agriculture and food sectors in many countries [8].…”
Section: Family Fruit Farms Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as noted by different authors, the softening of restrictions on the amount of land that landholders are legally allowed to deforest under the Forest Code was a clear reflection of the lack of law enforcement in Brazil [4,89,93,[110][111][112][113]. Other criticisms of PES initiatives in the Amazon include its limitations in terms of scope, outcomes and cost-effectiveness when compared to opportunity costs of actual land uses [103,[114][115][116][117]. These are also reasons why some proponents of the initiatives analyzed here, such as the Sustainable Landscapes Program, opted to not include PES as a strategy for benefit-sharing.…”
Section: Payments For Ecosystems Services (Pes) and Access To Financimentioning
confidence: 99%