2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
242
0
13

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
242
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This highlights the value of spatial analysis and the development of scenarios, as recommended by Balmford et al (2011), to (Nelson et al 2009;Raudsepp-Hearne et al 2010). However, one of the limitations of the current approach is that it focuses exclusively on changes in land cover and not condition or function (Verburg et al 2009;Crossman, Bryan, et al 2013). Conceivably, the management interventions being planned by the initiatives examined here could lead to improvements in the condition of existing habitats, which could be associated with increased provision of services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This highlights the value of spatial analysis and the development of scenarios, as recommended by Balmford et al (2011), to (Nelson et al 2009;Raudsepp-Hearne et al 2010). However, one of the limitations of the current approach is that it focuses exclusively on changes in land cover and not condition or function (Verburg et al 2009;Crossman, Bryan, et al 2013). Conceivably, the management interventions being planned by the initiatives examined here could lead to improvements in the condition of existing habitats, which could be associated with increased provision of services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Land cover information can be derived from remote sensing directly and one-to-one relations between land cover and ecosystem types are used. As no remote sensing information is available on the spatial distribution of land management and human intervention in the ecosystem (Verburg et al 2009a), integrated assessment models mostly represent agricultural management, forest management, grazing intensity and other disturbances as homogenous within a region or country. As a consequence, the heterogeneity of these landscape characteristics-though of prime importance to environmental impact assessment-cannot be accounted for.…”
Section: Representation Of Landscapes In Global Environmental Assessmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that there should be more attention for land (use) function change instead of focussing on land-cover change (Bakker and Veldkamp 2008;Verburg et al 2009), when assessing impacts of landuse change on indicators such as biodiversity. Land-use functions can be referred to as the goods and services provided by the land-use systems and ecosystems within the landscape (Verburg et al 2009;Paracchini et al 2011).…”
Section: Preference Of Land-use Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been argued that there should be more attention for land (use) function change instead of focussing on land-cover change (Bakker and Veldkamp 2008;Verburg et al 2009), when assessing impacts of landuse change on indicators such as biodiversity. Land-use functions can be referred to as the goods and services provided by the land-use systems and ecosystems within the landscape (Verburg et al 2009;Paracchini et al 2011). For instance, conservation goals for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes are actually linked with agroecosystem services such carbon storage, flood control, forage production, outdoor recreation, crop pollination and water provision (Chan et al 2006;Willemen et al 2008;de Groot et al 2010).…”
Section: Preference Of Land-use Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation