From Lake Nyassa to Philadelphia: a geography of the Zambesi Expedition, 1858–64

Abstract

Abstract. This paper is about collecting, travel and the geographies of science. At one level it examines the circumstances that led to Isaac Lea's description in Philadelphia of six freshwater mussel shells of the family Unionidae, originally collected by John Kirk during David Livingstone's Zambesi Expedition, 1858-64. At another level it is about how travel is necessary in the making of scientific knowledge. Following these shells from south-eastern Africa to Philadelphia via London elucidates the journeys necessary for Kirk and Lea's scientific work to progress and illustrates that the production of what was held to be malacological knowledge occurred through collaborative endeavours that required the travel of the specimens themselves. Intermediaries in London acted to link the expedition, Kirk's efforts and Lea's classification across three continents and to facilitate the novel description of six species of freshwater mussel. The paper demonstrates the role of travel in the making of mid-nineteenthcentury natural history and in developing the relationships and credibility necessary to perform the research on which classifications undertaken elsewhere were based.

The Spatial Turn: Geographical Approaches in the History of Science

“…57 See, for example, Keeling 2007. 58 Alberti 2005Dritsas 2005. transformation -more than straightforward diffusion -of data and theories. The implications of this are that the local and regional are not fixed points or bounded territories but rather instantiations of wider networks and flows.…”

Off the beaten track? Critical approaches to exploration studies

“…Upon the explorers' return, this new knowledge would then be considered in relation to the existing information already available (Latour, 1987; see also Cox, 2016). Botanical samples, zoological specimens, and archaeological curiosities were just some of the materials that were collected during these expeditions before being brought back to the European metropoles in order to be compared to the vast collections that had accumulated within these centres of calculation (Dristas, 2005;Wintle, 2013). Although it is clear that explorers continued to serve colonial interests, they were now understood, not necessarily as colonisers themselves, but rather as scientists or natural philosophers seeking to further human understanding.…”

History and philosophy of geography 2004-2005: biographies, practices, sites

“…Both this paper and that of Dritsas (2005) consider the ways in which different practices of expeditionary visualization -Ryan through photography, Dritsas through sketching and engravingallowed pictures of distant commodities (native humans, exotic shells) to become knowledge: only when dislocated from their context of discovery could their interpretation properly begin.…”