The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From laboratory to field: yield stability and shade avoidance genes are massively differentially expressed in the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences were much bigger for six of the genes expressed in 7 DAP spikes growing in the field compared to GC. This is consistent with the observation that stress inducible genes were expressed more strongly in field than in laboratory conditions [ 33 ]. These differences in expression might be the result of allelic variation among the tested genes, their genetic background and cross-talk with environments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These differences were much bigger for six of the genes expressed in 7 DAP spikes growing in the field compared to GC. This is consistent with the observation that stress inducible genes were expressed more strongly in field than in laboratory conditions [ 33 ]. These differences in expression might be the result of allelic variation among the tested genes, their genetic background and cross-talk with environments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It was already documented that constant irradiance during the day in controlled environments and lack of light-day transitions may significantly influence plant phenotype [ 27 ]. Consequently, many group of genes determining yield in normal and stress conditions, genes encoding chloroplast located proteins or shade avoidance (including genes involved in hormonal regulation, light and flowering) are differentially expressed in growth chamber versus field conditions [ 33 , 39 ]. Expression of CKX as well as biosynthetic IPT genes might also be regulated by the levels of available macronutrients, such as nitrate and phosphate [ 40 ], and biotic/abiotic stress conditions in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increasing evidence is pointing toward the unique character of plant molecular responses to combinations of stresses, which often have non‐additive effects on the molecular and phenotypic level (Atkinson & Urwin, 2012; Barah et al , 2016; Cabello et al , 2014; Davila Olivas et al , 2017; Johnson et al , 2014; Rasmussen et al , 2013; Suzuki et al , 2014; Thoen et al , 2017). As a result, perturbation studies performed under controlled laboratory conditions are often of limited predictive value for phenotypes in the field (Atkinson & Urwin, 2012; Mittler, 2006; Nelissen et al , 2014; Nelissen et al , 2019; Oh et al , 2009). It has been advocated that to close this lab‐field gap, more ‐omics data and associated phenotypic data should be generated on field‐grown plants (Alexandersson et al , 2014; Nelissen et al , 2019; Zaidem et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%