1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-6301(97)90262-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From knowledge to action: the impact of benchmarking on organizational performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
9

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
131
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale of organizational performance is adopted from Deshpande et al and Drew [52,53]. The measurement of organizational performance could be regarded as a variation of balance scorecard method by using global output measurement, such as profitability growth, cost saving and efficiency, market value created, and brand improvement.…”
Section: Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale of organizational performance is adopted from Deshpande et al and Drew [52,53]. The measurement of organizational performance could be regarded as a variation of balance scorecard method by using global output measurement, such as profitability growth, cost saving and efficiency, market value created, and brand improvement.…”
Section: Organizational Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trading Agent Competitions (TAC) challenge researchers to devise software agents for complex, uncertain environments such as supply chains (Arunachalam and Sadeh, 2005; and advertisement auctions (Jordan and Wellman, 2010), to benchmark them in direct competitions with each other, and to improve them iteratively. This practice has been found to foster creativity, improve learning, and facilitate innovation based on deep introspection (Garvin, 1993;Shetty, 1993;Drew, 1997).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competitor orientation can enhance a firm's competitive advantage by allowing it to benchmark with, learn from, imitate, and improve on the products of successful competitors (Drew, 1997;Day & Wensley, 1988). Unlike the long-term benefits of customer orientation, empirical research has produced widely divergent findings on the relationship between competitor orientation and organisational performance: Narver and Slater (1990) and Noble, Sinha, and Kumar (2002) identified a positive relationship between competitor orientation and organisational performance; Harrison-Walker (2001) discovered that no such relationship exists; Armstrong and Green (2007) and Armstrong and Collopy (1996) found the existence of a negative relationship; and Luo, Rindfleisch, and Tse (2007) claimed that there is a curvilinear relationship between the two.…”
Section: Competitor Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%