2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp110107p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Inert to Explosive, The Hydrolytic Reactivity of R−NSO Compounds Understood: A Computational Study

Abstract: We present a computational study on the concerted hydrolysis of several classes of N-sulfinylamines of generic formula R-N═S═O, such as the -amines themselves (R-NSO), -hydrazines (R-NH-NSO), -hydrazides (R-CO-NH-NSO) and -amides (R-CO-NSO), as these species are known to possess a wide range of hydrolytic reactivity. Two possible mechanisms of hydrolysis, with a water dimer across the S═O and N═S bonds, in the gas phase are investigated. The reactivity is discussed with respect to the electronic structures, es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of the charges determined from the electron density distribution gives C + N – N (Table ), which is not in accord with any of the possible valence bond structures for nitrilimines (Scheme ). This situation, different charge distributions from NBO and QTAIM approaches, is somewhat unexpected, as we found a good correspondence previously, albeit for a different, and less complex, electronic system (RNSO) . Both NBO and QTAIM agree, though, that the positive charge on the CNN carbon of 1 is much reduced from its value in the two species with large carbenic character, CF 2 and FCNNF (Table ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An analysis of the charges determined from the electron density distribution gives C + N – N (Table ), which is not in accord with any of the possible valence bond structures for nitrilimines (Scheme ). This situation, different charge distributions from NBO and QTAIM approaches, is somewhat unexpected, as we found a good correspondence previously, albeit for a different, and less complex, electronic system (RNSO) . Both NBO and QTAIM agree, though, that the positive charge on the CNN carbon of 1 is much reduced from its value in the two species with large carbenic character, CF 2 and FCNNF (Table ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This situation, different charge distributions from NBO and QTAIM approaches, is somewhat unexpected, as we found a good correspondence previously, albeit for a different, and less complex, electronic system (R-NSO). 50 Both NBO and QTAIM agree, though, that the positive charge on the CNN carbon of 1 is much reduced from its value in the two species with large carbenic character, CF 2 and F-CNN-F (Table 2).…”
Section: Insertion Of Cf 2 F-cnn-f and H-cnn-h Intomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although about 600 N-sulfinyl compounds are known today [8], only a few Nsulfinyl-aromatic-imines have been characterized and their reactivity has not yet been completely understood. While it is assumed that steric hindrance could lead to kinetic stabilization, the electronic effects, which substituents may cause in the aromatic N-sufinyl compounds, have not been determined [9]. The inclusion of a substituent group/atom in Nsulfinylaniline leads to a variation of charge distribution in the molecule, with consequent effects on the structural, electronic and vibrational parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is assumed that steric hindrance could lead to kinetic stabilization, the electronic effects, which substituents may cause in the aromatic N-sufinyl compounds, have not been determined. 9 The inclusion of a substituent group/atom in N-sulfinylaniline leads to a variation of charge distribution in the molecule, with consequent effects on the structural, electronic and vibrational parameters. Being an electron withdrawing group, 10 the presence of the NQSQO group could lead to the different mesomeric structures depicted in Scheme 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly popular choice of DFA in such studies is B3LYP. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Beyond DFT, common methods employed in computational studies of hydrolysis reactions include Hartree-Fock (HF) 23,25,31,35,45 and second order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), [23][24][25]30,32,47,48 with less frequent use of higher-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory, 24,30,49 coupledcluster, 25,47 and configuration-interaction methods. 30,31,48 While numerous benchmark studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of various exchange-correlation density functional approximations (DFAs) for the prediction of reaction thermochemistry, [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%