2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1791-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Implicit to Explicit CSR in a Scandinavian Context: The Cases of HÅG and Hydro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
28
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally Scandinavian countries, including Sweden, have operated under an institutional system and culture (Carson et al, 2013). In particular, primary CSR issues since the 1940s have been focused on safe working conditions and employment and social benefits (Tengblad & Ohlsson, 2010).…”
Section: O Ver the Past Few Decades Increasing Numbers Of Business Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally Scandinavian countries, including Sweden, have operated under an institutional system and culture (Carson et al, 2013). In particular, primary CSR issues since the 1940s have been focused on safe working conditions and employment and social benefits (Tengblad & Ohlsson, 2010).…”
Section: O Ver the Past Few Decades Increasing Numbers Of Business Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, higher levels of carbon disclosure may help safeguard brand reputations because a firm is further signaling to consumers that it is a socially responsible corporation. The significance of explicit CSR in explaining the intensity of participation (Tier 2 decision) but not participation (Tier 1 decision) in voluntary carbon disclosure by EU-based firms may in part be explained by the fact that there is contemporary evidence of the spread of U.S.-style, explicit CSR in Europe and elsewhere (Carson, Hagen, & Sethi, 2015;Eberhard-Harribey, 2006;Matten & Moon, 2008), which Djelic (2001) has called an outcome of the "Americanization" of management practices. Furthermore, although European companies have less discretion about whether or not to participate in carbon disclosure because of the EU's institutional framework, 25 there is room for discretion on the margins-based on individual company's benefit-cost analysis-regarding how much effort a firm will devote to voluntary carbon disclosure.…”
Section: Results Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being said, conditional on participation, European companies that disclose at higher levels to the CDP are the ones that have articulated a corporate vision for environmental sustainability and adopted ESG Second, although Moon (2005, 2008) and others (Carson et al, 2015;Strand, 2012) have articulated a national business systems approach to explain variation in U.S. and European styles of CSR, empirical analyses in the literature have primarily consist of either small N comparative case studies or medium to large N studies of companies based in one or two European countries. By contrast, this paper demonstrates in an analysis of a large N multicountry dataset the shifts in the balance of implicit and explicit CSR in Europe, which reflect changing features of corporations' historical national institutional frameworks and their immediate organization fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors have examined the types of CSR formed by the specific institutional background in France (Kang -Moon 2012), Germany (Witt -Redding 2012, Hiss 2009, and the Scandinavian countries (Carson et al 2015). It is particularly relevant to examine the specific types of CSR in the CEE region where significant differences exist in the institutional settings compared to those of Western Europe or overseas countries because of the specific historical features and heritage.…”
Section: The Double-dependent Market Economy and Csr In Hungarymentioning
confidence: 99%