2017
DOI: 10.1080/19368623.2017.1256802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From “Hypercritics” to “Happy Campers”: Who Complains the Most in Fine Dining Restaurants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study contributes to the literature on customer complaint behaviours and complaint management, and crisis management theory. Firstly, the prior literature has focused on customer complaint behaviours mainly in hotels (Hu et al , 2019) and restaurants (Khalilzadeh et al , 2017) and subsequently provided insights into complaint management about related industries. This study goes beyond the previous literature by removing the restrictions on the objects of complaints while concentrating on the special context of customer complaint behaviours and solutions in response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study contributes to the literature on customer complaint behaviours and complaint management, and crisis management theory. Firstly, the prior literature has focused on customer complaint behaviours mainly in hotels (Hu et al , 2019) and restaurants (Khalilzadeh et al , 2017) and subsequently provided insights into complaint management about related industries. This study goes beyond the previous literature by removing the restrictions on the objects of complaints while concentrating on the special context of customer complaint behaviours and solutions in response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results highlighted a number of issues with the current operationalization of EWOM in a restaurant context. We suspected that many current scales used for EWOM measurement were too general to impart meaningful information, such as: asking about posting “online” (Wu et al , 2019), on a “review site” (Hanks et al , 2016) or “other virtual pages” (Khalilzadeh et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most obvious problems related to the measurement of EWOM is that many existing scales are so general as to be virtually meaningless in today’s richly complex internet environment. For example, Wu et al (2019) ask about the likelihood of posting a “negative online review.” Khalilzadeh et al (2017) ask subjects how likely they would be to comment on social networks and “other virtual pages.” Likewise, Line et al (2018) ask whether a guest would post feedback “online” while Antón et al (2019) ask subjects if they would be likely to post on “social networks and other websites.” Clearly, the vague nature of these questions/measurement items fails to take into account the complexity that represents the current ecosystem of social media, UGC and multi-channel marketing, thus limiting the usefulness of information gleaned from such scales. Accordingly, the purpose of this research is to answer the question: what are contemporary assessments of EWOM actually measuring?…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might indicate that fine-dining restaurant customers could be more sensitive to service failures compared to those in a casual dining restaurant. Customers engage in relatively high expenditures and are likely to have higher service-quality expectations in fine-dining restaurants than other types of restaurants (Khalilzadeh et al, 2017;Kim and Boo, 2011). Therefore, compared to a casual dining context, customers may be more likely to become involved in voice complaining behavior regardless of the fellow customer's gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%