2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11310-4_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From High-Level Task Descriptions to Executable Robot Code

Abstract: Abstract. For robots to be productive co-workers in the manufacturing industry, it is necessary that their human colleagues can interact with them and instruct them in a simple manner. The goal of our research is to lower the threshold for humans to instruct manipulation tasks, especially sensor-controlled assembly. In our previous work we have presented tools for high-level task instruction, while in this paper we present how these symbolic descriptions of object manipulation are translated into executable co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other tools for high-level programming often assume an existing library of robot skills, e.g., tools supporting natural language instructions as for example presented by Stenmark et al [32] need basic knowledge of objects (and their coordinate frames) and that it is possible to update and refine solutions suggested by a learning and reasoning system to industrially adequate robustness and precision. Hence, we see our interface as appropriate to support even non-expert users in handling the construction of such basic knowledge items as well as in updating and refining existing solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other tools for high-level programming often assume an existing library of robot skills, e.g., tools supporting natural language instructions as for example presented by Stenmark et al [32] need basic knowledge of objects (and their coordinate frames) and that it is possible to update and refine solutions suggested by a learning and reasoning system to industrially adequate robustness and precision. Hence, we see our interface as appropriate to support even non-expert users in handling the construction of such basic knowledge items as well as in updating and refining existing solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified several issues during the programming process, which are mostly related to the traditional programming interfaces and assumed workflow for the YuMi [34,37]. From those issues, we derived requirements for the development of a programming interface that supports (and is supported by) our underlying architecture for skill representation and robot code generation [32].…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coordination between the layers is a complex problem, especially considering the difference in their contexts. Stenmark et al proposed the integration of high-level task description with action execution [46]. However, coordination of the tasks was not a goal of this work.…”
Section: ) Structures and Behaviour Models For Robot Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wächter et al (2016) show a use-case of transferring a state chart to a different robot. Stenmark et al (2015) talk about skill reuse, but only in the sense of reparametrization of the previously developed skill by a user, without providing an explicit framework for choosing the skills for reuse. By contrast, our study addresses the reuse of previous examples of execution based not only on action but also on object similarity, with the aim to reduce the user's parametrization effort.…”
Section: Comparison With the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%