“…This partly slow growth of crystal face families {(−1 0–1) (−1 0 1), (1 0 1), (1 0–1)} and fast progress of {(−1 1 0), (−1–1 0), (1 1 0), (1–1 0)} facilitate D 2h symmetry of the dodecahedron (Figure S52). Thus, the actual dodecahedron geometry of the crystals results from an integration of intrinsic homochiral features and differential growth rates. , Based on the sight of the crystallographic molecular structure, SEGPHOS and its fluoro-analogs SEGPHOS-CF2 have a similar spatial configuration and bonding parameters, in which SEGPHOS and SEGPHOS-CF2 exhibit dihedral angles (θ) of 76.6 and 79.6° between two 4,4′-bibenzo[ d ][1,3]dioxole parts, respectively. The trigonal P(III) centers are distorted due to subtle noncovalent interaction effects (NCIs) in both intermolecular and intramolecular disturbances (Figure a and Figure S34), i.e., the centroid contact could be noticed with 3.96 Å between phenyl and dioxole (Figure a).…”