2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From happy consumption to possessive bonds: When positive affect increases psychological ownership for brands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, the concept of psychological ownership has recently been applied to consumer behaviour. Objects of ownership range from brands (Thürridl et al , 2020) and online brand communities (Kuchmaner et al , 2019; Kumar, 2019) to fashion items (Lee and Chow, 2020) and consumers’ work on crowdsourcing platforms (Yuksel et al , 2019). Such studies have indicated that psychological ownership facilitates positive outcomes such as brand commitment (Thürridl et al , 2020), consumer citizenship (Yuksel et al , 2019), online brand community participation intentions, brand purchase intentions and positive word of mouth (Kumar, 2019) while lessening negative outcomes such as brand transgressions (Kuchmaner et al , 2019).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, the concept of psychological ownership has recently been applied to consumer behaviour. Objects of ownership range from brands (Thürridl et al , 2020) and online brand communities (Kuchmaner et al , 2019; Kumar, 2019) to fashion items (Lee and Chow, 2020) and consumers’ work on crowdsourcing platforms (Yuksel et al , 2019). Such studies have indicated that psychological ownership facilitates positive outcomes such as brand commitment (Thürridl et al , 2020), consumer citizenship (Yuksel et al , 2019), online brand community participation intentions, brand purchase intentions and positive word of mouth (Kumar, 2019) while lessening negative outcomes such as brand transgressions (Kuchmaner et al , 2019).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of past studies indicating specific adverse outcomes of PO were conducted in the organizational context (Brown et al , 2014; Van Dyne and Pierce, 2004). While Thürridl et al (2020) studied PO as an outcome in a branding context, the current study contributes to this scant literature by demonstrating the adverse result of PO in the context of IGA. PO for the game leads to a significantly negative effect of consumers' ATG on ATB, and this effect increases with increases in PO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…PO is found to moderate the relationship between ATG and ATB significantly, but contrary to the authors' expectation, it is found to weaken the effect of ATB on ATG. Hypothesis 5 was formulated based on the positive outcomes of PO found by various studies in organizational and consumption contexts like a higher commitment to the organization (Dawkins et al , 2017), brand attachment, purchase intention, willingness to spend (Thürridl et al , 2020). However, this another side of PO that points to its possible adverse outcomes like possessiveness toward the target (Dawkins et al , 2017), territorial behaviors (Brown et al , 2014), and resistance to any change in the target object.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of hedonic motives but also with further boosting their sense of selfworth, which is crucial for them; therefore, they chose shopping as a primary path to reach a higher level of self-efficacy (Pookulangara & Knight, 2013;Thürridl et al, 2020). To achieve interim pleasures, one gets tangled in the cobweb of compulsive buying, which results in the person becoming a shopping addict (Pradhan et al, 2018)., it is evidenced in the literature that possessiveness is a concurrent predictor of compulsive buying (Pradhan et al, 2018;Tarka, 2020), which in turn cultivates shopping addiction (Ahi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Possessiveness Hedonic Shopping Motives Self-efficacy and Sh...mentioning
confidence: 99%