2006
DOI: 10.1177/0961463x06062280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Gods to Goddesses

Abstract: Nutzungsbedingungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that we were concerned with circumstances where employees can exercise choice over their working arrangements, it was important to include not only formal arrangements, but also those of an informal or ad hoc nature, since as Healy (2004) observed, in practice, much flexible working is informal. In selecting studies, we focused on flexibility for employees, rather than those concerned with flexibility of employees (Alis et al 2006). Consequently, studies of FWAs imposed by employers in order to match the supply and demand for labour more closely (Atkinson 1985) and which are not designed to accommodate employees' preferences (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that we were concerned with circumstances where employees can exercise choice over their working arrangements, it was important to include not only formal arrangements, but also those of an informal or ad hoc nature, since as Healy (2004) observed, in practice, much flexible working is informal. In selecting studies, we focused on flexibility for employees, rather than those concerned with flexibility of employees (Alis et al 2006). Consequently, studies of FWAs imposed by employers in order to match the supply and demand for labour more closely (Atkinson 1985) and which are not designed to accommodate employees' preferences (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NSWAs have the potential to contribute towards organizational competitiveness and employee work-life balance (Alis, Karsten and Leopold, 2006;Conway, 2001). Even though classification of NSWAs is far from being absolute (see Barnett and Hall, 2001;Purcell, Hogarth & Simm, 1999;Raabe, 1996;Sheibl and Dex, 1998), two main categorizations have emerged throughout the years: arrangements that involve mainly employer-focused and those that involve mainly employee-focused NSWAs (Alis, Karsten and Leopold, 2006;Stavrou & Kilaniotis, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NSWAs have the potential to contribute towards organizational competitiveness and employee work-life balance (Alis, Karsten and Leopold, 2006;Conway, 2001). Even though classification of NSWAs is far from being absolute (see Barnett and Hall, 2001;Purcell, Hogarth & Simm, 1999;Raabe, 1996;Sheibl and Dex, 1998), two main categorizations have emerged throughout the years: arrangements that involve mainly employer-focused and those that involve mainly employee-focused NSWAs (Alis, Karsten and Leopold, 2006;Stavrou & Kilaniotis, 2009). The former classification denotes flexibility enforced to serve mainly organizational needs, such as increased operational efficiency and work time (Albion, 2004;Stavrou, 2005); nevertheless, it can also become employee-focused when employees prefer it (Brewster et al, 1997;Conway, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to this view is the assumption that employees would prefer permanent and/or full-time jobs were they available. Much of this evidence, however, relates to so called flexibility of rather than flexibility for employees (Alis et al, 2006). Flexibility for, or employeefriendly flexibility, alternatively provides employees with choice over the way in which they do their jobs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%