2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3343779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Glosten-Milgrom to the Whole Limit Order Book and Applications to Financial Regulation

Abstract: We build an agent-based model for the order book with three types of market participants: informed trader, noise trader and competitive market makers. Using a Glosten-Milgrom like approach, we are able to deduce the whole limit order book (bid-ask spread and volume available at each price) from the interactions between the different agents. More precisely, we obtain a link between efficient price dynamic, proportion of trades due to the noise trader, traded volume, bid-ask spread and equilibrium limit order bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see that for all these assets, the liquidity provision intensity is approximately a decreasing function of the queue size. This result reveals a quite common strategy used in practice: posting orders when the queue is small to seize priority (for further details about the priority value, see [17]). For all assets, the consumption intensity is an increasing function when the queue size is large.…”
Section: Computation Of the Intensities And The Stationary Measurementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can see that for all these assets, the liquidity provision intensity is approximately a decreasing function of the queue size. This result reveals a quite common strategy used in practice: posting orders when the queue is small to seize priority (for further details about the priority value, see [17]). For all assets, the consumption intensity is an increasing function when the queue size is large.…”
Section: Computation Of the Intensities And The Stationary Measurementioning
confidence: 81%
“…After that, we estimate the new market intensities in a situation where we suppose that he withdraws from the exchange by subtracting the agent intensity from the market one, see Corollary 1. We finally compute the new market volatility estimators σ 2,G and σ 2,M k corresponding to this new scenario using Equation (17) and Remark 17 again.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…informed market maker cancels his order is 1 − f ). The introduction of the IMM and this parameter are the main differences and bring the main effects compared to the conclusions drawn by [HRS19] • One noise trader: he sends market orders without intelligence. Usually he is a liquidity taker trading for liquidity shocks unrelated to the actual dynamics.…”
Section: • Informed Market Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the preamble on the nature of market participants, we build our agent-based model as in [HRS19;GM85]. Contrary to these papers we consider 4 types of market participants: an informed trader, a noise trader, informed market makers and noise market makers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because they can rapidly marginally adjust their quotes to seize price priority. In the case of a large tick asset, speed is still an important feature as market participants have to compete for queue priority in the order book, see [17,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%

On bid and ask side-specific tick sizes

Baldacci,
Bergault,
Derchu
et al. 2020
Preprint
Self Cite