Gender and Equestrian Sport 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6824-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Glamour to Drudgery – Changing Gender Patterns in the Equine Sector: A Comparative Study of Sweden and Great Britain in the Twentieth Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also included a broadening class demographic. While formal equestrian sports were once populated by the military elite and aristocracy, now, an increasing number of working- and middle-class amateurs take part—with the entry levels to affiliated competitions dropping as participation broadens [ 41 , 44 ]. Further, a market of new products and services challenge ‘old’ wisdoms and tastes, such that there are now more opportunities for a variety of styles of clothing, equipment and regime to suit different budgets and tastes (Velcro in place of buckles, animal print rugs, and so on) [ 39 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also included a broadening class demographic. While formal equestrian sports were once populated by the military elite and aristocracy, now, an increasing number of working- and middle-class amateurs take part—with the entry levels to affiliated competitions dropping as participation broadens [ 41 , 44 ]. Further, a market of new products and services challenge ‘old’ wisdoms and tastes, such that there are now more opportunities for a variety of styles of clothing, equipment and regime to suit different budgets and tastes (Velcro in place of buckles, animal print rugs, and so on) [ 39 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural work, for example, is widely socially constructed as masculine yet is experienced unevenly by women and men, particularly because of the emotional work involved in turning live animals into commodities to be consumed by people (Ellis, , ; Ellis & Irvine, ; Halley, ; Porcher, ; Wilkie, ). Work in sporting industries that involve animals often reflect and reproduce predictable patterns of inequity through the division of labour and gendered performances (Butler, ; Butler & Charles, ; Larsen, ), although national contexts and political projects also shape local specifics to varying degrees (Coulter, ; Hedenborg, , ; Hedenborg & White, ; Thorell & Hedenborg, ). Moreover, the daily labour processes, including the care and dirty work requirements, as well as the racialization of certain occupations like stable staff/groom in a number of locales, reinforce the need for an intersectional and context‐specific lens which illuminates commonalities and differences (Cassidy, ; Castañeda, Kline, & Dickey, 2013; Coulter, ; Miller, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to historical documents, near the beginning of the modern era, on the territory inhabited by Romanians, purebred horses were owned only by local aristocrats, which used them for saddling, warfare, carriage, and especially to highlight their power, rank and political allegiances. In time, the breed horses also started to be owned by the lower social classes for equine-based labour, which is a phenomenon also characteristic to Croatian Lipizzan horses (Španiček, 2019: 214-215), and currently they are under transition from "work horse to sport horse" (Hedenborg, White, 2013). Despite the lesser role given to work horses, these animals' prestige gained due to their centuryconnection with the aristocracy, and military-based horsemanship did not fully disappear from the collective consciousness, especially given "the extent to which our culture, especially in the domains of language, literature, visual and performative arts, is informed by the centuries of interaction between humans and horses" (Ropa, 2019: 1).…”
Section: T H E E L E P Ha N T I N T H E Ro Om Wa S a Hor Sementioning
confidence: 99%