2008
DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/25/9/093001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From geometry to numerics: interdisciplinary aspects in mathematical and numerical relativity

Abstract: This article reviews some aspects in the current relationship between mathematical and numerical General Relativity. Focus is placed on the description of isolated systems, with a particular emphasis on recent developments in the study of black holes. Ideas concerning asymptotic flatness, the initial value problem, the constraint equations, evolution formalisms, geometric inequalities and quasi-local black hole horizons are discussed on the light of the interaction between numerical and mathematical relativist… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 540 publications
(991 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further details, including mathematical aspects of the equations and characteristic techniques, can be found in the review articles [113,92,114,115].…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details, including mathematical aspects of the equations and characteristic techniques, can be found in the review articles [113,92,114,115].…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Black Holesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the once perplexing simulations of colliding black holes are now routine applications that can be executed on moderate workstations. This is a result of a journey that spans decades of interdisciplinary work, drawing from seemingly divergent fields such as geometry, numerical analysis, software design, physics etc [55,50,29]. On the other hand, the field has reached a state of maturity that it can prove useful in other contexts such as gravity theories other than general relativity and in spacetime dimensions higher than four.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the essence of the formulation problem in numerical relativity [76,67]. In general, a typical recipe for a successful numerical evolution must take into account the following points: Initial data problem [33], Formulation problem [76], Boundary problem, Gauge problem and so on, See [50,5,13,41] for an in-depth discussion of these and other practical aspects of numerical relativity. It is conceivable that, when considering fourth order gravity, each of these areas will be affected in non-trivial ways by the accompanying new degrees of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, FCF is fundamentally different from fully hyperbolic formulations of GR and can be used as another check of the consistency of the numerical solutions of Einstein equations. There are other formulations which incorporate the constraints into the evolution system (see [56], section 5.2.2., for most relevant examples); however, no numerical simulations have been performed yet with most of them (e.g., [57]), or simulations are restricted to axisymmetric spacetimes (e.g., [58]). Moreover, FCF is a natural generalization of the CFC approximation; this fact makes possible a natural extension of all the numerical codes which use this approximation, in order to have a proper treatment of the gravitational radiation of the system without too much effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%