From frames to OWL2: Converting the Foundational Model of Anatomy

Abstract

Objective The Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) is an ontology that represents canonical anatomy at levels ranging from the entire body to biological macromolecules, and is rapidly become the primary reference ontology for human anatomy, and a template for model organisms. Prior to this work, the FMA was developed in a knowledge modeling language known as Protégé Frames. Frames is an intuitive representational language, but is no longer the industry standard. Recognizing the need for an official version of the FMA in the more modern semantic web language OWL2 (hereafter referred to as OWL), the objective of this work was to create a generalizable Frames-to-OWL conversion tool, to use the tool to convert the FMA to OWL, to “clean up” the converted FMA so that it classifies under an EL reasoner, and then to do all further development in OWL. Methods The conversion tool is a Java application that uses the Protégé knowledge representation API for interacting with the initial Frames ontology, and uses the OWL-API for producing new statements (axioms, etc.) in OWL. The converter is relation centric. The conversion is configurable, on a property-by-property basis, via user-specifiable XML configuration files. The best conversion, for each property, was determined in conjunction with the FMA knowledge author. The convertor is potentially generalizable, which we partially demonstrate by using it to convert our Ontology of Craniofacial Development and Malformation as well as the FMA. Post-conversion cleanup involved using the Explain feature of Protégé to trace classification errors under the ELK reasoner in Protégé, fixing the errors, then re-running the reasoner. Results We are currently doing all our development in the converted and cleaned-up version of the FMA. The FMA (updated every 3 months) is available via our FMA web page http://si.washington.edu/projects/fma, which also provides access to mailing lists, an issue tracker, a SPARQL endpoint (updated every week), and an online browser. The converted OCDM is available at http://www.si.washington.edu/projects/ocdm. The conversion code is open source, and available at http://purl.org/sig/software/frames2owl. Prior to the post-conversion cleanup 73% of the more than 100,000 classes were unsatisfiable. After correction of six types of errors no classes remained unsatisfiable. Conclusion Because our FMA conversion captures all or most of the information in the Frames version, is the only complete OWL version that classifies under an EL reasoner, and is maintained by the FMA authors themselves, we propose that this version should be the only official release version of the FMA in OWL, supplanting all other versions. Although several issues remain to be resolved post-conversion, release of a single, standardized version of the FMA in OWL will greatly facilitate its use in informatics research and in the development of a global knowledge base within the semantic web. Because of the fundamental nature of anatomy in both understanding and organizing biomedical infor...

Matching biomedical ontologies through compact differential evolution algorithm

“…In recent years, various biomedical ontologies, such as FMA (Detwiler, Mejino, & Brinkley, 2016) and SNOMED-CT (Filice & Kahn, 2019), have been widely used in the life science domain (Faria et al, 2018). However, existing biomedical ontologies that cover overlapping domains are mostly developed independently, and the different ways of defining the same biomedical concept yield heterogeneous problems among biomedical ontologies, which hampers their inter-operability.…”

Owlready: Ontology-oriented programming in Python with automatic classification and high level constructs for biomedical ontologies

“…The development of recent biomedical terminologies has also been heavily influenced by ontologies. Examples are SNOMED CT (Standardized NOmenclature of MEDicine -Clinical Terms) [7], Gene Ontology [8] and the FMA (Foundational Model of Anatomy) [9], which was recently converted to OWL 2 [10].…”

The Knowledge Frame System based on Principles of Topological Functioning Model

“…Limitations mentioned by authors are inadequate representation of knowledge [23], greater expressiveness that can lead pure ontologies to the loss of information in case of transformation into them [16], [17], [25], necessity to work with the completely known characteristics and static knowledge domain [18], representation of the procedural knowledge as a programming code inside frames [18], and the fact that complex structures can decrease the performance of the system inference and execution [15], [19].…”

“…The widely used way of entering knowledge into the frame knowledge base is manual, i.e., a knowledge engineer enters facts and assertions about the domain based on results of interviews with domain experts and other information about the domain [14]- [17]. Only in case of text analysers automated entering is applied, but the amount of human participation in this process is not clear [18]- [21].…”

“…Integration with other knowledge representation systems is possible, e.g., with product rules and business constraints [31], OWL [17], [21], [31], fuzzy logic [26], and modal logic [29]. …”