2002
DOI: 10.1177/019145370202800604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From fight to debate

Abstract: In A History of Florence, Machiavelli recounts revolts, especially of the Ciompi of 1378, which display the repeated surfacings of the desire for freedom navigating ceaselessly between the desire to abolish freedom through the recourse to absolute power and moments when virtue triumphs over fortuna and achieves an order that, while fragile, makes the antagonisms fit in such a way that instead of fights they become debates. For Machiavelli, the speeches made in these situations serve to both analyze the circums… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this interpretation, Machiavelli supported the workers' struggle for political representation and for equality before the law but opposed the demands for redistribution and for participatory democracy in matters of manufacturing and production. 42 Commentators have focused on the speech's ostensibly corrupt account of justice, 43 on the resentment and fear and the Political Theory 40 (6) lack of a coherent political perspective, 44 and on the allegedly un-Machiavellian appeal to socioeconomic equality 45 as reasons for why the speech is, in Hanna Pitkin's words, "not an articulation of Machiavelli's views." 46 This strand of interpretation sees the radicalism of the speech as a symptom of a failed political system.…”
Section: Machiavelli's Two Voicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this interpretation, Machiavelli supported the workers' struggle for political representation and for equality before the law but opposed the demands for redistribution and for participatory democracy in matters of manufacturing and production. 42 Commentators have focused on the speech's ostensibly corrupt account of justice, 43 on the resentment and fear and the Political Theory 40 (6) lack of a coherent political perspective, 44 and on the allegedly un-Machiavellian appeal to socioeconomic equality 45 as reasons for why the speech is, in Hanna Pitkin's words, "not an articulation of Machiavelli's views." 46 This strand of interpretation sees the radicalism of the speech as a symptom of a failed political system.…”
Section: Machiavelli's Two Voicesmentioning
confidence: 99%