2020
DOI: 10.1177/1471301220957805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From evidence to practice: Developing best practice guidelines for the delivery of activities to people living with moderate to advanced dementia using a pragmatic observational study

Abstract: The benefits of physical activities for those living with moderate to advanced dementia are well documented and include improved well-being and quality of life. What is less well known is how best to deliver such activities to make them meaningful for those taking part and, more generally, how to develop good practice guidance for working with this group. This article reports on an observational study of a physical activity programme in a residential care setting, Mobile Me, and on the process used to develop … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some participants were not able to perform all, or some of, the Fullerton Functional Fitness Tests, or the standing balance tests, due to issues with their mobility or confidence. Some residents lacked capacity to consent and could not therefore be included in the main evaluation; however, a separate study was carried out with these individuals using structured observation ( Burke et al, 2021 ). Further limitations were a lack of randomization to the clusters, the inclusion of two rather than three follow-ups in the control group, the fact that the behavioral outcome measures were based on self-report, and small sample sizes for subgroup measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some participants were not able to perform all, or some of, the Fullerton Functional Fitness Tests, or the standing balance tests, due to issues with their mobility or confidence. Some residents lacked capacity to consent and could not therefore be included in the main evaluation; however, a separate study was carried out with these individuals using structured observation ( Burke et al, 2021 ). Further limitations were a lack of randomization to the clusters, the inclusion of two rather than three follow-ups in the control group, the fact that the behavioral outcome measures were based on self-report, and small sample sizes for subgroup measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence generated from the Get Healthy Get Active programme mapped against the intended outcomes. Notes:1Get Active Get Healthy, what we have learned so far[34], Tackling Inactivity[43], 2Design Principles[44], 3Sport England Evaluation Framework[45], 4Hertfordshire Evaluation Framework[49], 5Examples of publications include[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Fynn et al International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2021) 18:31…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%