2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-010-9208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Evidence-based Medicine to Marketing-based Medicine: Evidence from Internal Industry Documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…45,46 It is also unclear how well findings from highly controlled research settings translate into effectiveness in real-world settings. An attempt was made to consider patient values and preferences by reviewing our clinical experience and incorporating feedback from parents of children and adolescents with disruptive or aggressive behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 It is also unclear how well findings from highly controlled research settings translate into effectiveness in real-world settings. An attempt was made to consider patient values and preferences by reviewing our clinical experience and incorporating feedback from parents of children and adolescents with disruptive or aggressive behaviour.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rarely can such a recommendation provide undisputable scientific arguments for reimbursing drugs, given the nature of clinical and pharmacoeconomic data submitted by drug companies (Sismondo, 2008;Spielmans and Parry, 2010). ''In half of the research results (submitted by drug companies), we deal with drugs whose effectiveness cannot be established.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salami slicing/duplicative publication can distort the medical literature by making a drug appear strongly supported based on the sheer volume of publications analyzing clinical trial data. This plays into strategic publication plans of drug companies, which utilize journal articles as key marketing tools, often utilizing medical writers to create manuscripts ready for journal publication in a timely manner [1,2]. Academic authors (aka “key opinion leaders”) typically serve as authors, augmenting the credibility of journal articles via their perceived expertise and independence from the sponsor, which enhances the value of the drug brand [1,3].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplicative pooled analyses may be more representative of “marketing-based medicine” or propaganda than of actual contributions to science [2]. Editors and peer reviewers might weed out some such analyses, yet the ultimate responsibility lies with authors, who should realize that duplicative “salami science” does little to advance either science or patient care.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%