2020
DOI: 10.1177/0309132520910798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From eviction to evicting: Rethinking the technologies, lives and power sustaining displacement

Abstract: An unnamed shift has occurred in geographies of eviction. While past research focused on the causes and effects of eviction in political economy, state power, and cultural difference, emerging work emphasises the subjective experience and sustaining practices of eviction as it happens. This paper makes the case for this turn away from causes and outcomes of ‘eviction’, and towards ‘evicting’ as a set of material technologies and practices that sustain displacement, and explores the implications of such a shift… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we join a chorus of recent studies that are cognizant of the limitations of resistance (Wilhelm‐Solomon, 2021; Maqsood and Sajjad, 2021). As Baker (2021: 808) contends, eviction is the way the state appropriates time and space through ‘linked materials, people, and technologies across the multiple axes’. The multidimensional constellations of urban politics may keep the conversation about the politics of inhabitations alive, yet the state retains the dominant, though not absolute, power to define the grammar of urban politics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, we join a chorus of recent studies that are cognizant of the limitations of resistance (Wilhelm‐Solomon, 2021; Maqsood and Sajjad, 2021). As Baker (2021: 808) contends, eviction is the way the state appropriates time and space through ‘linked materials, people, and technologies across the multiple axes’. The multidimensional constellations of urban politics may keep the conversation about the politics of inhabitations alive, yet the state retains the dominant, though not absolute, power to define the grammar of urban politics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, tensions arise between the state's rationalized model of citizenry and the diverse practices of citizenship (Holston, 2008). The current focus on seeing the act of domicide as the embodiment of home‐unmaking, extreme and violent as it is, overlooks the fact that there is also ‘everyday’ home‐unmaking, which takes place long after the physical home is razed (Baker, 2021). Furthermore, many feminist geographers contend that homemaking and home‐unmaking are two processes that occur simultaneously rather than sequentially (Blunt, 2005; Rao, 2010; Brickell, 2012a; Nowicki, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marxist urban geographies have long recognized that the creation of surplus value requires the production, dispossession, and annihilation of space, resulting in displacement of previous land users and the accumulation of exchange value (Harvey 2003)-apparent in the metaphorical displacement and fixing of value in space (Bok 2019). Dispossessive displacement in processes of expulsion (Sassen 2014), land grabs (Li 2010), eviction (Baker 2020b), dispersal (Garelli and Tazzioli 2016), and development (Wang and Wu 2019) allows the realization and capture of exchange value through the displacement of previous users of a space or resource. In the context of migration, displaced and im/mobilized "floating" labor power is feminized and exploited by virtue of its informal status (Gago 2017;Coddington, Conlon, and Martin 2020;De Genova and Roy 2020), forced into reliance on exploitative rentier economies (Wu, Zhang, and Webster 2013;Cowan 2018), or rendered as captive consumers and laborers in carceral confinement (Conlon and Hiemstra 2014).…”
Section: Choice Value and Infrastructure: Concerns And Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also leads to a ‘fragmented habitus’ of the Roma (Creţan et al, 2022). Shifting the focus from causes and outcomes of evictions to their means and agents, Lancione (2017), Zamfirescu and Chelcea (2021) and Baker (2020) interrogate the non-human agencies, for example material technologies, infrastructures, practices and affective capacities, that sustain practices of eviction.…”
Section: Expulsions and The Unsettling Of Socio-spatial Orders In Rom...mentioning
confidence: 99%