From Equivocality to Reflexivity in Biodiversity Protection

Abstract

This paper focuses on the silent conversations by individual change makers reflecting upon their concerns in relation to their social and natural worlds. We investigate the internal and external deliberations that informants have by using a qualitative theory building approach in the empirical context of a biodiversity protection issue field in Finland. We conduct 27 interviews with individual change makers representing three types of organizations: government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and businesses. We seek to understand how change makers advancing biodiversity protection reflexively manage the uncertainty and equivocality they face in the interstitial issue field in the course of their change efforts. Our results show that change makers engage in three iterative actions around the issue of biodiversity: filtering, modeling, and translating. They therefore find nuanced ways to convey the biodiversity issue to their stakeholders and, in this way, promote the engagement of other organizational and individual actors in its protection.

Strategies for regenerative business

“…Adaptation has been defined as enabling "the system to better cope with, manage or adjust to some changing condition, stress, hazards, risk, or opportunity" (Smit and Wandel, 2006: 282). Regenerative approaches are adaptive in that they are based on reflexive responses to change and surprise in order to sustain the life-enhancing capacity of SES (du Plessis and Brandon, 2015;Quarshie et al, 2019). Adaptation is seen as a co-evolutionary process where regenerative organizational practices and strategies enable the adaptive capacity of SES, while in turn adapting to changes of SES (Folke et al, 2005).…”

Interorganizational Interaction in Disaster Response Networks: A Government Perspective

“…All rights reserved (partially) organized sub-networks (Burt, 2000;Rasche, De Bakker, & Moon, 2013). For example, future studies could examine how governments or otherwise focal or powerful actors within complex climate change and biodiversity protection networks (Quarshie, Salmi, & Wu, 2019) can create a sense of immediacy and steer the efforts of the various participants.…”

Luonnon monimuotoisuuden huomioivat toimitusketjut ja luontopohjaiset ratkaisut

“…Strategian päätavoite on pysäyttää luonnon monimuotoisuuden köyhtyminen Suomessa vuoteen 2020 mennessä (Ympäristöministeriö 2019). Yrityksille ympäristöministeriö on järjestänyt yhdessä yritysvastuuverkoston (FIBS ry) kanssa koulutusta liittyen luonnon monimuotoisuuteen ja ekosysteemipalveluihin (Quarshie, Salmi & Wu 2019;FIBS 2019a). Esimerkiksi metsäsektorin ja muiden raaka-aineista riippuvaisten toimialojen yrityksistä monet ovat jo integroineet luonnon monimuotoisuutta tukevia tavoitteita yritysvastuu-tai ympäristöohjelmiinsa (ks.…”