From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’

Abstract

This paper takes stock of geographical contributions to the study of energy and energy futures. The paper is written in two parts. First, I trace the methodological and philosophical traditions that underpin geographical approaches to energy studies. I argue that while 'energy geography' is arguably a pragmatic shorthand with which to communicate to the broader energy studies community, geographical studies of energy have expanded in scope and theoretical plurality so that 'energy geographies' is a more appropriate label. Energy geographers are well positioned to contribute to scientific and policy debates surrounding energy due to their privileged position at the borderland between various philosophical and methodological traditions. Second, I identify some of the problems, opportunities and uncertainties that contemporary energy geographers are helping to identify, understand, and resolve. Past contributions and critical issues for future scholarship are highlighted in four themes: (1) using advanced socio-spatial theory to better understand the energy-society relationship; (2) geo-political and geo-economic assessments of (changing) global energy trade networks; (3) geographical perspectives on socio-technical (energy) transitions; and (4) advanced spatial decision-support for energy planning and technology implementation. While this discussion is by no means exhaustive, it aims to bring some clarity and specificity to the policy and academic relevance of geographical thought and practice as it relates to energy issues.

The political economy of energy transitions in Mozambique and South Africa: The role of the Rising Powers

“…Prospects for new flows of energy bring together disparate social groups into conversations about allocation, costs/benefits and acceptable end uses whilst the development of energy infrastructure has significant ethical and socio-economic implications which are not diffused or experienced evenly across space (Calvert, 2015). Decisions about which resources to prioritise and where to build new infrastructure can thus (re)produce uneven economic development at regional scales (Bouzarovski et al, 2012) along with conditions of energy poverty at local and household scales.…”

Rescaling Energy? Räumliche Neuordnungen in der deutschen Energiewende

“…Während einige AutorInnen vor einer "local trap" warnen, die die kleinste räumliche Einheit zwangsläufig als die beste ansieht (Brown und Purcell, 2005), plädieren Featherstone et al (2012) (Cowell et al, 2015). Catney et al (2014) stellen die energiepolitische Agenda in England, die lokalen Community-Projekten eine hohe Bedeutung beimisst, in den Kontext der neoliberalen Big-Society-Ideologie, die bestehende Ungleichheiten zwischen einzelnen Gemeinden und Regionen ausblendet und einen Rückzug des Staates propagiert. Auf Deutschland bezogen haben Monstadt und Scheiner (2016) gezeigt, wie die räumlichen Ausgangsvoraussetzungen der Bundesländer in unterschiedliche finanzielle Interessen übersetzt wurden.…”

“…Darüber hinaus versuchen Arbeiten aus der angloamerikanischen Humangeographie, aktuelle Veränderungen in der Energieversorgung mit grundlegenden theoretischen Paradigmen der Disziplin zu verknüpfen (Bridge et al, 2013;Calvert, 2016;Huber, 2015). Sowohl Calvert (2016) als auch Huber (2015) weisen dabei auf das Potential hin, gegenwär-tige Veränderungen im Energiesektor als Raumproduktionen zu diskutieren.…”

“…Sowohl Calvert (2016) als auch Huber (2015) weisen dabei auf das Potential hin, gegenwär-tige Veränderungen im Energiesektor als Raumproduktionen zu diskutieren. Die Frage räumlicher Maßstabsebenen (Scales), deren Entstehung und Veränderung, spielt dabei eine zentrale Rolle.…”

A Tale of Sustainability and Equity: Defining a Safe Operating Space for Households’ Energy Vulnerability

“…The consumption of natural resources, particularly in urban areas, is a matter of increasing concern (Lorimer 2012;Lambin et al 2001;Rockström et al 2009;Calvert 2015). This problem is exacerbated by continual global population growth, which is projected at up to 9 billion in the near future, coupled with an accelerated rural-to-urban migration (UN 2014).…”