2017
DOI: 10.5325/complitstudies.54.2.0329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Empire to Independence: Colonial Space in the Writing of Tutuola, Ekwensi, Beti, and Kane

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms 1 From Empire to Independence: Colonial Space in the Writing of Tutuola, Ekwensi, Beti and Kane AbstractThis article examines the production of space in four early Anglophone and Francophone West African novels, reading Amos Tutuola's The Palm-Wine Drinkard (Nigeria, 1952), Cyprian Ek… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spanning India, South Africa, the Caribbean and Singapore, these five articles take a broad geographical view of the multitudinous nature of space across registers and eras, demonstrating a common spirit in the vision that identity, subjectivity and spatiality cannot be seen as discrete and disinterested entities, but rather as co-constitutive parts of a dynamic and total system. I have elsewhere written on the urgent need to reconstitute the ways in which we, as literary and cultural critics, think about and talk about space, moving from a mere focus on content to an exploration of the articulations and correspondences which motivate the production of space (Krishnan 2017). In other words, space is not merely what the text says, but what the text does.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spanning India, South Africa, the Caribbean and Singapore, these five articles take a broad geographical view of the multitudinous nature of space across registers and eras, demonstrating a common spirit in the vision that identity, subjectivity and spatiality cannot be seen as discrete and disinterested entities, but rather as co-constitutive parts of a dynamic and total system. I have elsewhere written on the urgent need to reconstitute the ways in which we, as literary and cultural critics, think about and talk about space, moving from a mere focus on content to an exploration of the articulations and correspondences which motivate the production of space (Krishnan 2017). In other words, space is not merely what the text says, but what the text does.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%