2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00268.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Emic to Etic: Exporting Indigenous Constructs

Abstract: The study of culture differs by methodology. This article distinguishes etic (global) and emic (focal) approaches to cross‐cultural research, and uses empirical studies in personality and social psychology as examples to illustrate the pros and cons of these two approaches and examine their relationships. Then, the article reviews origins and trends of research on several culturally derived constructs, including face, harmony, filial piety, and modesty. The import and export processes of pan‐cultural and indig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M. Cheung et al, 2003; Kwan et al, 1997). The contrast between phenomena understood to be universal and those that are believed to be indigenous to a distinctive context is too sharply drawn (S. X. Chen, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. Cheung et al, 2003; Kwan et al, 1997). The contrast between phenomena understood to be universal and those that are believed to be indigenous to a distinctive context is too sharply drawn (S. X. Chen, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general characteristic of the studies conducted to date is the strong imbalance between a large number of studies on prejudicial attitudes and the relative scarcity of research on discriminatory behaviors per se (Fiske, Harris, Lee, & Russell, ; Rattan & Ambady, ; Sasaki & Vorauer, ). A second general tendency is the concern to identify general social‐psychological determinants that operate in the same way across countries (e.g., social dominance orientation, Sidanius & Pratto, ) and the disregard for the role of culture‐specific determinants that can operate differently in different countries (Amir & Sharon, ; Chen, ; Chiu & Hong, ; Fiske & Cuddy, ; Guimond et al, ; Hilton & Liu, ; Hong, Morris, Chiu, & Benet‐Martinez, ). In this research, we address these two themes together by studying the determinants of discriminatory behaviors and by testing the hypothesis that the effect of what can be considered as “general” factors of discrimination can vary as a function of culture‐specific variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be advantageous to conduct more empirically focused efforts, using both an emic (culture‐specific) and etic (culture‐general) approach to investigating peak‐experiences cross‐culturally in other Asian cultures. One may begin with the etic approach that adopts the universalist assumption to study cultural similarities in basic psychological processes, and then use the emic approach to identify cultural differences and distinctiveness in human behavior (S. X. Chen, ). Such research will enable a more comprehensive assessment of the salience of peak‐experiences in non‐Western samples and their potential usefulness for counseling adolescents, young adults, and families.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%