From “Either‐Or” to “When and How”: A Context‐Dependent Model of Culture in Action

Abstract

In this article, I outline a framework for the sociological study of culture that connects three intertwined elements of human culture (cultural motivations, resources, and meanings) and demonstrates the concrete contexts under which each most critically influences actions and their subsequent outcomes. In contrast to models that cast motivations, resources, and meanings as competing explanations of how culture affects action, I argue that these are fundamental constituent elements of culture that are inseparable, interdependent, and simultaneously operative. Which element provides the strongest link to action, and how this link operates, must be understood as a function of the actor's position within wider social contexts. I argue that on average motivations have the most discernable link to action within a social strata, cultural resources provide the strongest link across strata, and meanings have the greatest direct influence when codified and sanctioned. I then offer a reframing and synthesis that reintegrates previously “competing” theories of culture into a more holistic context‐dependent model of culture in action. Finally, I use evidence from prior empirical research, as well as new data from an ongoing ethnographic study of health behaviors among the aged, to show how various elements of culture are concretely linked to action in eight different social contexts. In doing so, I provide a roadmap for the transition out of the “either‐or” logic underlying much of cultural theory and reemphasize the importance of the classical sociological concern for “when” and “how” various aspects of culture influence action and outcomes in concrete social contexts.

Increasing public support for food-industry related, obesity prevention policies: The role of a taste-engineering frame and contextualized values

“…We term these "contextualized values," as they are articulations that are relevant to domainspecific contexts, such as health care, racism, or sexuality (Patterson, 2014). Contextualized values provide evaluative ideas, and thus can be deployed as resources in public discourse to shape new, socially-shared valuations (Abramson, 2012;Patterson, 2014). Patterson (2014) notes how social change in racism and sexism are partially due to some actors in racist or sexist communities articulating new values of racial or sex equality.…”

“…Value dimensions are deeper, permanent, but usually unarticulated, ideals based on evaluations of what is ultimately meaningful (Patterson, 2014;Swidler, 1986;Vaisey, 2009). These are "inputs" (Abramson, 2012) that may shape opinion and action in a pre-discursive way (Vaisey, 2009), quite differently than contextualized values.…”

The modern career of ‘the oldest profession’ and the social embeddedness of metaphors

“…The metaphor served each group's struggle to maintain prostitution as a 'going concern' (Hughes, 1971) in the face of this apathy, invoking conflicting definitions of prostitution with an ostensibly shared metaphor. Speaking together does not mean thinking together, however, even when discourses are seemingly coherent (Ignatow, 2004), a finding stressed by the renewed focus on social context in cultural sociology (Abramson, 2012).…”

Community Recovery Following theDeepwater HorizonOil Spill: Toward a Theory of Cultural Resilience

“…NRCs, for example, have been demonstrated to invoke particularly strong attachments to place, which can be integral to the forming of individual and community identity that governs how individuals understand appropriate action by themselves and others (Cheng et al 2003). Focusing on the way culture is used , however, allows the researcher to also view it as an “individual parameter” (Abramson 2012), thus granting the concept necessary room for individual variation and agency, rather than leaving it a blanket term for broad generalizations of social behavior.…”