2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1293-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From eggs to fledging: negative impact of urban habitat on reproduction in two tit species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
75
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
9
75
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remains that while the other breeding traits show strong significant differences between forest and city, it did not translate in a similarly strong divergence for fledgling success. This result contrasts with previous findings in great tits (Bailly et al, 2016) and with the common assessment that the urban environment induces strong constraints on avian reproduction (Gil and Brumm, 2014). It raises the very interesting question of whether urban birds might display adaptive breeding strategies that differ from birds in the forest, yet do not lead to lower reproductive success (see further discussion on this possibility, below).…”
Section: Phenotypic Divergence Between Forest and City And Along The contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains that while the other breeding traits show strong significant differences between forest and city, it did not translate in a similarly strong divergence for fledgling success. This result contrasts with previous findings in great tits (Bailly et al, 2016) and with the common assessment that the urban environment induces strong constraints on avian reproduction (Gil and Brumm, 2014). It raises the very interesting question of whether urban birds might display adaptive breeding strategies that differ from birds in the forest, yet do not lead to lower reproductive success (see further discussion on this possibility, below).…”
Section: Phenotypic Divergence Between Forest and City And Along The contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The essential elements richness was lower in urban sites and, interestingly, it appeared to be positively correlated with the nestling mass and body condition. Our results are consistent with those reported in previous studies (Hõrak, 1993;Chamberlain et al, 2009;Bailly et al, 2016b) on the components of reproductive output, and suggest mechanisms to explain the negative effect of urbanization on the reproductive performance of Great tits.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…To acquire a robust insight into the relationship between urbanization and distress behavior, we assayed three different distress behaviors (distress calling rate, pecking rate, and breath rate) in seven replicate pairs of urban and rural/forest populations across Europe. Previous work on this species has revealed many differences between urban and rural great tits in terms of morphology (Horak et al, 1995;Senar et al, 2014;Biard et al, 2017), physiology (Andersson et al, 2015;Salmón et al, 2016;Toledo et al, 2016), genetics (Björklund et al, 2010;Riyahi et al, 2015), life-history (Berressem et al, 1983;Schmidt and Einloft-Achenbach, 1984;Isaksson and Andersson, 2007;Hedblom and Soderstrom, 2012;Bailly et al, 2015;Vaugoyeau et al, 2016;Charmantier et al, 2017), population dynamics (Horak and Lebreton, 1998), and behavior (Slabbekoorn and Peet, 2003;Salaberria and Gil, 2010;Riyahi et al, 2017). Urban great tits have been found to be more explorative and less neophobic than rural tits (Tryjanowski et al, 2016;Charmantier et al, 2017;Riyahi et al, 2017), to display shorter flight initiation distances (Møller et al, 2015), and to show a higher problem solving performance than rural birds (Preiszner et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%