2000
DOI: 10.1215/10829636-30-1-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From “Diseases of Women” to “Secrets of Women”: The Transformation of Gynecological Literature in the Later Middle Ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These forms of diagrams also had sociopolitical implications. The use of a male figure as the normative or default form of the body relegated women's health and obstetrics to other charts, figures, or manuscripts that rarely circulated in tandem with the manuscripts by (and for) men [35]. The humoural framework underlying the diagrams also had consequences (in later eras, for instance, encouraging "heroic" treatments of severe bloodletting and purging [94]).…”
Section: Reasoning About Disease and Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forms of diagrams also had sociopolitical implications. The use of a male figure as the normative or default form of the body relegated women's health and obstetrics to other charts, figures, or manuscripts that rarely circulated in tandem with the manuscripts by (and for) men [35]. The humoural framework underlying the diagrams also had consequences (in later eras, for instance, encouraging "heroic" treatments of severe bloodletting and purging [94]).…”
Section: Reasoning About Disease and Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At its most extreme, misogynists described the female as being misshapen in the womb, fundamentally different from men created in God's image, and closer in kind to beasts. 8 One aspect of Christine's response, according to Benjamin Semple, is to note the limits of philosophy as a discipline of human thought that is constantly tested and subject to revision. 9 To join this debate, she rejects the essentialist position that "men were essentially created to understand whereas women were essentially created to procreate", as Earl Jeffrey Richards notes, claiming a place for women alongside men in the Field of Letters.…”
Section: Quid Est Mulier?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As feminist historians and cultural theorists have shown, although women may or may not see themselves as actively keeping secrets, in the history of west-ern culture, they ubiquitously have been represented as secretive (Parkins, 2007). For example, western science since the early modern period has conceptualized women's genitalia and generational processes as the domain of secrets, which scientific tools have been harnessed to penetrate and police (Green, 2000). With the rise of consumer culture, commercial interests in fashion and cosmetics have continued to colonize and capitalize on women's apparent beauty secrets, which male purveyors have repackaged as products for expanding female markets.…”
Section: Theorizing Body Secretsmentioning
confidence: 99%