“…In line with work that provides a more contextualized understanding of Internet use (Sims, 2014), we argue for a more differentiated understanding of online participation. Our ONLINE PARTICIPATION 5 conceptualization questions the presumption of activity or agency on the one hand, and the positive valence of participation on the other.…”
“…In line with work that provides a more contextualized understanding of Internet use (Sims, 2014), we argue for a more differentiated understanding of online participation. Our ONLINE PARTICIPATION 5 conceptualization questions the presumption of activity or agency on the one hand, and the positive valence of participation on the other.…”
“…Using a large, representative survey, we compared the social profiles of the benefits and harms associated with using the Internet. The findings on benefits follow existing digital divide findings on access, skills, uses and participation, in the sense that highly educated, high income younger users tend to be privileged in all or some of these aspects (Blank, 2013;Brake, 2014;Correa, 2010;Hargittai, 2002Hargittai, , 2010Hargittai and Hinnant, 2008;Hargittai and Shafer, 2006;Hargittai and Walejko, 2008;Van Deursen and Van Dijk, 2010;2014; Van Deursen and Predicted values from harms model Van Dijk, 2006;Zillien and Hargittai, 2009). The findings also confirm the U&G theory postulate that groups with different demographic and social characteristics will use the Internet to gratify different needs.…”
Recent studies have enhanced our understanding of digital divides by investigating outcomes of Internet use. We extend this research to analyse positive and negative outcomes of Internet use in the United Kingdom. We apply structural equation modelling to data from a large Internet survey to compare the social structuration of Internet benefits with harms. We find that highly educated users benefit most from using the web. Elderly individuals benefit more than younger ones. Next to demographic characteristics, technology attitudes are the strongest predictors of online benefits. The harms from using the Internet are structured differently, with educated users and those with high levels of privacy concerns being most susceptible to harm. This runs counter to intuitions based on prior digital divide research, where those at the margins should be most at risk. While previous research on digital inequality has only looked at benefits, the inclusion of harms draws a more differentiated picture.
“…Such platforms on the "Internet hails its audiences" in a way that is similar to how nondigital environments are intended for particular groups of people (Nakamura & Lovink, 2005, p. 61). As a result, there is a need to consider not only different levels of access but how through "differentiating practices" some digital identities are relegated to the periphery and some are privileged (Sims, 2013).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.